Hasselblad Flextight X1 vs Hasselblad Flextight X5
SOURCE ARTICLES
Used Hasselblad Flextight X1 - is it worth it?
www.photo.net
The user is considering upgrading from an Epson V750 to a used Hasselblad Flextight X1 for medium format scanning. The X1 has a lower resolution than the Nikon Coolscan 9000, but it is priced at less than half the cost. The user is looking for opinions on whether the X1 is worth the upgrade or if they should continue saving for the Nikon 9000.
A Photographers Guide To Scanning 35mm Film.
benmacphotos.com
The review compares three scanners for scanning 35mm film: the Hasselblad Flextight X1, Nikon Super Coolscan 4000, and Epson v500. The Hasselblad and Nikon scanners produce better image quality than the Epson, with the Nikon being the top choice for its sharpness and film grain rendition. The Hasselblad has a slight edge in resolution but the difference is small. The Epson v500 is not recommended for printing. The review also mentions issues with the scanners, such as haze on the Epson's glass and fading LEDs on the Nikon SA-21 film strip adapter.
A $16,000 Photo Scanner vs. a $500 Scanner
petapixel.com
The review compares the quality of a $16,000 Hasselblad Flextight X1 photo scanner to a $500 Epson v700 scanner. The Flextight scan produces sharper and more detailed images with visible grain, while the v700 scan is softer and lacks shadow and highlight detail. The author calibrates the v700 scan by applying sharpening, but it still falls short of the Flextight scan. The Flextight is superior for scanning 35mm negatives, while the v700 is suitable for medium format scans. The review emphasizes the importance of printing to truly assess image quality.
Flextight scanner vs. camera scan quality
The user is considering switching from a Flextight X1 scanner to a camera scanning setup for scanning 35mm, 6x6, 6x12, and 4x5 film. They are interested in Negative Supply LLC's camera scan products. They want to know if they can achieve the same quality as the Flextight scanner in terms of sharpness and tonal gradations. They plan to use a Sony A7R III or IV camera with a 90mm macro lens and Negative Supply LLC's Film Carrier and Light Source Pro light table. The answer is that they can achieve similar results with the right gear and settings, but they may need to adjust their settings to get the desired results. The user also asks about using a 2:1 macro lens, and it is mentioned that the Laowa 2x macro lens is a good performer. The user is advised to practice and relearn color correction when switching to camera scanning. They also mention the possibility of stitching images for larger formats like 6x12 and 4x5. The user plans to test the pixel-shift function of the A7R IV and report the results.
Tom Price Photography — Film Scanning Review: $15,000 Flextight X1 v.s. $120 Epson V550
The review compares the $15,000 Flextight X1 CCD scanner by Hasselblad with the $120 Epson V550 flatbed scanner. The X1 has a maximum optical resolution of 6300dpi, Dmax 4.6, and auto focus, while the V550 has a maximum resolution of 4800dpi and Dmax 3.4. The X1's software keeps more information in the file, resulting in larger file sizes. The review includes examples of positive film and color negatives scanned by both scanners.
Hasselblad Flextight X5 scanner trade in
The Hasselblad Flextight X5 scanner offers high-quality scans at high speed, surpassing other desktop scanners. Hasselblad is currently offering a trade-in deal where they will give you £2500 for your old scanner if it still works when you upgrade to the X5.
Hasselblad Flextight X5 Scanner - DISCONTINUED
The Hasselblad Flextight X5 Scanner is a top model in the Flextight scanner series, offering ease of use, high quality, and batch scanning capabilities. It allows freedom to choose between digital or film and uses the unique 3F workflow for optimal image extraction. The scanner is highly productive with fast scanning speed and various feeding devices. It also features heat reduction solutions and provides excellent sharpness and resolution.
Hasselblad Flextight X1 drum scanner test report: Short test and comparison with Flextight X5
The Hasselblad Flextight X1 is a high-quality film scanner that offers excellent image quality. It is comparable to its bigger brother, the Flextight X5, with only minor differences in image sharpness and the appearance of film grain. The X1 is capable of scanning large formats up to 13x18cm, which the X5 cannot do. The X1 is slower than the X5, but still provides a respectable scan speed. Overall, the choice between the X1 and X5 comes down to personal preference and the need for high capacity scanning.
Test driving the Hasselblad Flextight X5 Scanner
The Hasselblad Flextight X5 scanner is designed for professional use and offers high image quality and performance. It can scan film (transparency/negative) and prints. The scanner allows for preset configurations or a RAW-like output called 3F workflow. The scanning process is simple and efficient, with high dpi options available. The X5 produces detailed scans with noticeable improvements over other scanners. The scanner uses a CCD optical sensor and has a light condensator to hide scratches and dust. The X5 is larger and heavier than the X1 model. Overall, the X5 is praised for its ease of use, film holder system, and high-quality output.
Test report drum scanner Hasselblad Flextight X5: Image quality, scan speed, measured values, image samples, comparison with Nikon Super Coolscan 9000 ED
The Hasselblad Flextight X5 is a professional drum scanner that offers outstanding image quality and fast scanning speeds. It uses a virtual drum scanning technique to ensure perfect flatness of the original material, resulting in sharp and clear scans. The scanner has a maximum resolution of 8000ppi for 35mm images and a maximum density value of Dmax of 4.9. It also offers the option to scan non-transparent materials up to A4 size. The scanner comes with a range of film adapters and accessories, and the included FlexColor software provides extensive adjustment options. The scanning speed of the Flextight X5 is impressive, with a scan of a 35mm image taking just one minute at a resolution of 5000ppi. Overall, the Hasselblad Flextight X5 is a top-of-the-line scanner that delivers professional-level image quality and performance.
+ 7
AI COMPARISON
Comparison Table
| Feature | Hasselblad Flextight X1 | Hasselblad Flextight X5 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Scan Resolution (Optical) | 39,690,000 dpi | 64,000,000 dpi |
| Thickness | 230 mm | 230 mm |
| Weight | 20,500 g | 20,500 g |
| Dimensions (W x H) | 390 mm x 650 mm | 390 mm x 650 mm |
| Max Scan Size | 33,600 mm² | 28,000 mm² |
| Bit Depth (Color) | 16-bit | 16-bit |
| Connectivity | USB, No WiFi | USB, No WiFi |
| 35mm Film Scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Scan to PDF | Yes | No |
| Auto Scan Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Volume | 58,305 cm³ | 58,305 cm³ |
| Additional Features | Ability to scan up to 6x12 formats, thicker films | Can scan non-transparent materials up to A4 size |
Summary
Common Features: Both the Hasselblad Flextight X1 and X5 share several high-quality features such as 16-bit color depth, the capability for 35mm film scanning, USB connectivity, and identical physical dimensions and weight. They both operate with a high optical resolution, although the X5 has a superior maximum resolution. Neither scanner has WiFi capabilities, but both have USB ports and support auto scan mode.
Differences: The X1 has a maximum optical resolution lower than the X5 (39.69 MP vs. 64 MP) and can handle larger maximum scan sizes. The X5, however, not only has a higher resolution but also supports scanning of non-transparent materials up to A4 size, making it versatile for different mediums. The X1 includes features like scanning to PDF, which is not mentioned for the X5. Importation of non-transparent materials up to A4 size, along with batch processing features, makes the X5 more suitable for high-volume professional environments. Additionally, the X5 has been described as having a faster scan speed compared to the X1.
Performance: Based on reviews, the X1 is celebrated for its high-quality image output, with superior focus and sharpness, making it suitable for high-resolution print jobs. The X5, on the other hand, despite having a higher resolution, produces softer images but is faster, indicating a trade-off between image quality and speed. The X5 also offers significant improvements in handling and features like an active sensor cooling system and light condensator that minimizes dust and scratch appearance, beneficial for high-volume scanning operations.
Recommendations
- Professional Photographers and Archivists: The Flextight X5 would be recommended for professional users who need to scan a high volume of various film formats quickly, particularly when dealing with both transparent and non-transparent materials.
- Artists and Print Makers: For those prioritizing ultimate image quality for large format prints, the Flextight X1, despite its slower speed, offers sharper images and excellent detail preservation.
- General Users: For everyday users looking to digitize film without the need for rapid batch processing, the X1 offers a robust solution with the ability to create detailed scans sufficient for most print sizes.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
