Canon EOS C300 Mark II

is the image worth the price?

The Canon C300 mkII has been a controversial camera due to debates about its image quality and dynamic range. While some tests show it has 12 usable stops of dynamic range, others claim it has 14. However, the camera's pleasing color rendition and the addition of an 'Alexa matching' profile called Production have received positive feedback. The C300 mkII performs well in artificial and mixed light, which is a weakness of Sony's line. The reviewer finds that the images from the C300 mkII look better than those from the Sony FS7, even without significant grading. The difference in color between the two cameras may be worth the higher price for some users. However, others may find that cameras like the F5, FS7, or FS5 are already good enough for their needs. The original C300 is still sufficient for many factual TV shooters, especially since most broadcasters have not yet moved to 4K. Ultimately, the decision on whether the C300 mkII's color matters will depend on individual preferences.

Canon C300 MKII Review: Part 1

The Canon C300 MK II is a camera that offers improved features and functionality compared to its predecessor. It has a similar size and weight, with a redesigned top handle that provides better stability. The camera now uses detachable audio/video cables, which are interchangeable and easier to repair. The power system has been upgraded, requiring new batteries that are more expensive. The camera has assignable buttons and improved focus features, including face detection and tracking. It also offers new options for slow motion and pre-record functions. The camera records to C-Fast 2.0 cards and has improved terminal outputs for monitoring and external recording. It now includes an internal microphone and the ability to record proxy files. Overall, the camera offers a range of new features and improvements for professional videographers.

Canon EOS C300 Review

The Canon EOS C300 is a midrange professional video camera that struggles to find its place in the market. It has a modular design with many buttons and controls, but it is quite bulky and heavy when fully loaded. The camera offers direct control over exposure settings and includes on-screen waveform and zebra highlights for exposure monitoring. It lacks an autoexposure mode, which may disappoint documentary filmmakers. The C300 has a variety of I/O ports and a removable handgrip and handle. The external LCD panel can be folded down but blocks some controls when folded. The camera records video at up to 1080p30 resolution with good color sample rate and bitrate. It uses an 8.3-megapixel Super35 image sensor with high ISO shooting capabilities. The autofocus system is capable but struggles in dim light. Overall, the C300 is a capable camera but its high price makes it a tough sell, especially when compared to the more affordable C100 Mark II or the higher-end C500.

Connecting IT to Broadcast

The Canon EOS C300 Mark II is a revamped version of the original C300 camera. It features a new sensor, high data rate memory cards, high bit depth recording, and a new codec. The camera supports 4K/2K film resolutions as well as UHD/HD, and offers a wide range of recording formats. It has improved ergonomics, including a flexible configuration and improved handle design. The camera has a wide color gamut and supports HDR recording. It also has autofocus with focus assist and can be remote controlled. Overall, the C300 Mark II is a versatile camera suitable for various productions.

Canon C300 Mark II Lab Test – Dynamic Range 2 Stops Less Than Expected

The Canon C300 Mark II camera, priced at $16,000, has been highly anticipated by customers. However, in a lab test, it was found to have a dynamic range of only 12.3 stops, instead of the claimed 15 stops. The camera also exhibited noise in dark areas, even at its base ISO of 800. Comparisons with other cameras showed that the C300 Mark II performed similarly to the Sony FS7, but fell short of the Arri ALEXA in terms of dynamic range and noise performance. The camera's high ISO capabilities were also found to be underwhelming. Overall, while the C300 Mark II had some advantages over the FS7, it did not meet expectations in terms of image quality.