Canon EOS C100 Mark II vs Canon EOS C300 Mark II

by Steve Mims: Review: Canon Cinema EOS C100 Mark II at DVinfo.net

The review discusses the debate around the necessity of 4K in the Canon Cinema EOS C100 Mark II. The reviewer points out that while 4K is not a useless feature, it brings added expenses in terms of processing power and file sizes. They also highlight the advantages of 4K and mention that the lack of 4K in the C100 Mark II doesn't make it a useless camera. The reviewer compares the C100 Mark II to the GH4 and explains why they prefer the C100 for shooting events. They mention the better light sensitivity, audio options, and on-camera tools of the C100. The reviewer also discusses the limitations of shooting 1080p on a 4K camera and compares the image quality of the GH4 and Canon.

Review: Canon Cinema EOS C100 Mark II

The Canon Cinema EOS C100 Mark II is a highly praised camera that offers a range of features and improvements over its predecessor. It has an intuitive menu, ergonomic design, and a compact battery system. The built-in AVCHD recording is elegant and inexpensive, and setting up an external ProRes recorder is easy. The camera is solidly built and has no systemic failures. The new OLED screen and viewfinder are bright and sharp, making operating the camera a pleasure. The DIGIC DV4 processor reduces noise in the image, and the new Canon lenses are sharp and affordable. The camera's range of usable ISO settings is a standout feature. While it doesn't offer 4K output, the reviewer doesn't see this as a major drawback, as 2K projection still looks great. The need for 4K is questioned, as it is not yet a broadcast requirement and may primarily be driven by manufacturers' desire to sell new products. Overall, the Canon C100 Mark II is a well-engineered camera that delivers excellent results at a reasonable price.

Why I actually like it

The reviewer, Matt Allard, likes the Canon C100 Mark II despite its lack of high frame rates and 4K recording. He believes that for run and gun users, web content creators, and event shooters, 4K is not essential and can be a hindrance. The camera's affordable SD media, long battery life, and compact size make it convenient for on-the-go shooting. The autofocus system works well, but the internal microphone is not usable in windy conditions. The camera's image quality is good, although the reviewer found the blacks to be crushed in C-Log. Overall, the C100 Mark II is a solid choice for HD recording.

Canon C300 MKII Review: Part 2

The Canon C300 MKII offers a wide range of gamma settings, including the new Canon Log 2. In terms of exposure, Canon Log 2 provides a smooth gradient transition from shadows to highlights, while Canon Log has increased saturation and contrast. The camera has a dynamic range of around 14-14.3 stops, and noise becomes noticeable above ISO 800. Canon Log 2 is ideal for narrative work with controlled lighting, while Canon Log is suitable for documentary settings. It is important to do your own tests to understand the camera's capabilities.

Canon EOS C300 Product Review — Wedio

The Canon EOS C300 is a professional cinema camera that offers remarkable imaging performance and outstanding mobility. It excels in low light conditions and supports the Canon lens system. The camera has a sharp electronic viewfinder and a multi-step in-camera neutral density filter. However, it maxes out at 1080p30 video resolution and lacks a full-frame image sensor. The C300 is recommended for professional filmmakers who are willing to invest in a quality camera. However, if you don't need broadcasting options or have a limited budget, there are alternative cameras available.

Camera Review: Canon C300 II vs. Sony FS7

The Canon C300 Mark II and Sony FS7 are head-to-head competitors in the $10,000 range. Both cameras have built-in ND filters and offer good color and flexibility in post-production. The Canon has better preamps and autofocus, while the Sony is better for slow motion. The Canon has a better EVF and is more strippable, but the Sony is lighter and easier to shoulder mount. Overall, it comes down to personal preference and familiarity with the camera.

is the image worth the price?

The Canon C300 mkII has been a controversial camera due to debates about its image quality and dynamic range. While some tests show it has 12 usable stops of dynamic range, others claim it has 14. However, the camera's pleasing color rendition and the addition of an 'Alexa matching' profile called Production have received positive feedback. The C300 mkII performs well in artificial and mixed light, which is a weakness of Sony's line. The reviewer finds that the images from the C300 mkII look better than those from the Sony FS7, even without significant grading. The difference in color between the two cameras may be worth the higher price for some users. However, others may find that cameras like the F5, FS7, or FS5 are already good enough for their needs. The original C300 is still sufficient for many factual TV shooters, especially since most broadcasters have not yet moved to 4K. Ultimately, the decision on whether the C300 mkII's color matters will depend on individual preferences.

Canon C300 MKII Review: Part 1

The Canon C300 MK II is a camera that offers improved features and functionality compared to its predecessor. It has a similar size and weight, with a redesigned top handle that provides better stability. The camera now uses detachable audio/video cables, which are interchangeable and easier to repair. The power system has been upgraded, requiring new batteries that are more expensive. The camera has assignable buttons and improved focus features, including face detection and tracking. It also offers new options for slow motion and pre-record functions. The camera records to C-Fast 2.0 cards and has improved terminal outputs for monitoring and external recording. It now includes an internal microphone and the ability to record proxy files. Overall, the camera offers a range of new features and improvements for professional videographers.

Canon EOS C300 Review

The Canon EOS C300 is a midrange professional video camera that struggles to find its place in the market. It has a modular design with many buttons and controls, but it is quite bulky and heavy when fully loaded. The camera offers direct control over exposure settings and includes on-screen waveform and zebra highlights for exposure monitoring. It lacks an autoexposure mode, which may disappoint documentary filmmakers. The C300 has a variety of I/O ports and a removable handgrip and handle. The external LCD panel can be folded down but blocks some controls when folded. The camera records video at up to 1080p30 resolution with good color sample rate and bitrate. It uses an 8.3-megapixel Super35 image sensor with high ISO shooting capabilities. The autofocus system is capable but struggles in dim light. Overall, the C300 is a capable camera but its high price makes it a tough sell, especially when compared to the more affordable C100 Mark II or the higher-end C500.

Connecting IT to Broadcast

The Canon EOS C300 Mark II is a revamped version of the original C300 camera. It features a new sensor, high data rate memory cards, high bit depth recording, and a new codec. The camera supports 4K/2K film resolutions as well as UHD/HD, and offers a wide range of recording formats. It has improved ergonomics, including a flexible configuration and improved handle design. The camera has a wide color gamut and supports HDR recording. It also has autofocus with focus assist and can be remote controlled. Overall, the C300 Mark II is a versatile camera suitable for various productions.

Canon C300 Mark II Lab Test – Dynamic Range 2 Stops Less Than Expected

The Canon C300 Mark II camera, priced at $16,000, has been highly anticipated by customers. However, in a lab test, it was found to have a dynamic range of only 12.3 stops, instead of the claimed 15 stops. The camera also exhibited noise in dark areas, even at its base ISO of 800. Comparisons with other cameras showed that the C300 Mark II performed similarly to the Sony FS7, but fell short of the Arri ALEXA in terms of dynamic range and noise performance. The camera's high ISO capabilities were also found to be underwhelming. Overall, while the C300 Mark II had some advantages over the FS7, it did not meet expectations in terms of image quality.