Asus TUF Gaming VG249Q3A 24" vs Gigabyte G24F 2 24"
SOURCE ARTICLES
AI COMPARISON
Comparison Table
| Feature | Asus TUF Gaming VG249Q3A 24" | Gigabyte G24F 2 24" |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 23.8" | 23.8" |
| Resolution | 2073600 px | 2073600 px |
| Pixel Density | 92 ppi | 92 ppi |
| Display Technology | IPS, LCD | LED, LCD, IPS |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Refresh Rate | 180Hz | 180Hz |
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB Ports | 0 | 3 |
| USB Type-C | No | Yes |
| Power Consumption (Oper) | 18W | 17.5W |
| Standby Power | 0.5W | 0.5W |
| Weight | 3500 g | 4800 g |
| Luminance | 250 nits | 300 nits |
| Color Coverage (sRGB) | 99% | 125% |
| Contrast Ratio | 1000:1 | 1100:1 |
| VESA Mount | Yes | Yes |
| Speakers | Yes (Stereo, 4W) | No |
Summary
Both the Asus TUF Gaming VG249Q3A and Gigabyte G24F 2 are 24-inch gaming monitors with a Full HD resolution, very fast response times, and high refresh rates suitable for gaming. They share features like 180Hz refresh rate, 1ms response time, IPS technology, and support for AMD FreeSync technology.
However, there are differences:
- The Asus monitor offers built-in stereo speakers and slightly lower power consumption during operation.
- The Gigabyte monitor has a higher luminance (300 nits compared to 250 nits), better color coverage (125% sRGB vs. 99% sRGB), and a slightly better contrast ratio. It also includes more connectivity options like three USB ports and a USB Type-C port, which are absent on the Asus model.
Recommendations
For gamers looking for the best visual quality and extra USB connectivity, the Gigabyte G24F 2 is the better choice due to its superior color accuracy, brightness, and additional ports.
For users who prioritize integrated audio and slightly lower energy consumption, the Asus TUF Gaming VG249Q3A would be more suitable, especially if built-in speakers are a must-have.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
