AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Specs
www.techpowerup.com
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is a server/workstation processor with 64 cores and 128 threads. It operates at a base frequency of 2.7 GHz and can boost up to 4.5 GHz. The processor has 256 MB of L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with an eight-channel interface. It has a TDP of 280 W and requires top-notch cooling. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX lacks integrated graphics and supports hardware virtualization. It is built on a 7 nm production process with 33,200 million transistors. The processor uses AMD Socket WRX8 and has a PCI-Express Gen 4 connection. It supports ECC memory and programs using AVX and AVX2.
Comprehensive Review AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX, Performance Verified!
www.cnwintech.com
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is a powerful workstation processor that offers impressive performance. It features 64 cores and 128 threads, with a maximum boost clock of 4.5GHz. The CPU is based on the Zen 3 architecture and has a TDP of 280W. It is compatible with the WRX80 motherboard and supports 8-channel memory. In terms of performance, the 5995WX outperforms mainstream CPUs in tasks like CG rendering and video encoding. However, it is expensive and may not be worth the investment for all users. Overall, the 5995WX is a high-performance CPU for professionals in need of a powerful workstation.
Apple Mac Studio (M1 Ultra) Review
www.pcmag.com
The Apple Mac Studio (M1 Ultra) is a powerful desktop computer that delivers impressive processing and graphics performance. It features a compact design, plenty of ports, and a powerful cooling system. The M1 Ultra processor, with its 20 processing cores and 64 GPU cores, provides exceptional performance in productivity and content creation tasks. The Mac Studio also excels in graphics and gaming, with its 64 GPU cores delivering impressive results. While it may not be the best choice for gaming, the Mac Studio is a true powerhouse for professional studios.
Apple Mac Studio (M1 Ultra)
The Apple Mac Studio (M1 Ultra) is a powerful desktop computer with impressive performance. It has a compact design, plenty of ports, and a powerful cooling system. The display is a 5K Retina display with Thunderbolt connectivity. The Mac Studio comes with MacOS Monterey, which is stable and easy to use. The M1 Ultra processor delivers excellent performance in productivity and content creation tasks. It also has a strong graphics performance, although gaming experiences may be limited. Overall, the Mac Studio (M1 Ultra) is a true powerhouse and the best value for Mac users in need of power.
Apple M1 Ultra
Apple has unveiled the M1 Ultra, the final member of the M1 family of Apple Silicon SoCs. It offers improved performance for both CPU and GPU workloads, with a monolithic GPU created by combining two M1 Max dies. This marks a first in the chipmaking industry.
Apple Mac Studio with M1 Ultra review: A workstation-class upgrade for iMac and Mac Mini users
The Apple Mac Studio is a powerful and compact workstation-class desktop that combines the M1 Max or M1 Ultra processors. It has a compact design, good connectivity, and runs cool and quiet. However, it is expensive and lacks internal expansion or user upgrades. The Mac Studio is available with either an M1 Max or M1 Ultra processor and has a striking design similar to the Mac Mini. It has plenty of ports, including Thunderbolt 4 and USB-A ports, and improved connectivity. The M1 processors inside the Mac Studio provide excellent performance, with the M1 Ultra offering a 20-core CPU, 48 or 64 GPU cores, and a 32-core Neural Engine. The Mac Studio is priced starting at $1,999 for the M1 Max model and $3,999 for the M1 Ultra model. It does not include a monitor, keyboard, or mouse. The Mac Studio runs cool and quiet thanks to its thermal design. However, it lacks internal expansion ports. Overall, the Mac Studio is a powerful and elegant desktop option for creative professionals, but it may not be suitable for those who require extensive customization or upgrades.
REVIEW: Apple Mac Studio M1 Ultra
The Apple Mac Studio M1 Ultra is a powerful and compact computer that combines two M1 chips for enhanced performance. It is not upgradable but can be paired with external SSD drives. The computer comes with OS Monterey 12.4 and has features like Universal Control for increased mobility. It is optimized for photographers, filmmakers, and graphic designers. The Mac Studio M1 Ultra has a sleek design with comprehensive connectivity ports. It outperforms other Mac models in tasks like importing and processing large files. It can run up to four displays simultaneously. Apple's announcement of new computers with the M2 chip may make consumers consider their options.
Apple Mac Studio with M1 Ultra Review: Size doesn't matter
The Apple Mac Studio with M1 Ultra is a powerful and compact desktop PC designed for creators and professionals. It offers impressive performance for tasks like editing 8K video and 3D rendering. The M1 Ultra chipset is more powerful than the M1 Max, but it's also more expensive and unnecessary for most users. The Mac Studio has a small footprint, similar to a Mac Mini, and comes with a variety of ports including Thunderbolt 4 and USB Type-A. It stays cool and quiet even under heavy workloads. However, it lacks native Windows support and is not suitable for gaming. Overall, the Mac Studio is best-in-class for those who need its power and compact size.
2022 Mac Studio (20-core M1 Ultra) Review
The 2022 Mac Studio (20-core M1 Ultra) is a powerful and compact supercomputer that delivers exceptional CPU performance. In a computational fluid dynamics benchmark, the Mac Studio outperformed previous Intel-based Mac systems, even surpassing the 28-core Mac Pro. The M1 Ultra chip's high memory bandwidth and efficient design contribute to its impressive performance. The review suggests that the Mac Pro's transition to Apple Silicon could lead to even greater performance gains.
Early Reviews Suggest the Mac Studio M1 Ultra Is Fast—But in Some Uses, Not by Much?
The early reviews of the Mac Studio M1 Ultra suggest that it is a powerful and fast computer, but it may be too much for most filmmakers' needs. The M1 Ultra outperforms the M1 Max in some tasks, but the M1 Max has an advantage in basic rendering tasks. The M1 Ultra shines in GPU-heavy applications, cutting render times significantly. However, in general, the performance difference between the M1 Ultra and M1 Max is minimal. The consensus is that the choice between the two depends on the specific tasks and requirements of the user.
Apple Mac Studio Review Part 2: Mac Studio and the M1 Ultra for video editors by Scott Simmons
The Apple Mac Studio is a powerful and compact computer that is highly recommended for video editors. It outperforms custom-built PCs with NVIDIA GPUs and offers excellent connectivity options with Thunderbolt and USB ports. The Mac Studio is quiet and reliable, even during long and intensive transcoding jobs. The inclusion of multiple ports, including HDMI and 10-gig Ethernet, is a big win for post-production professionals. The Mac Studio is also surprisingly portable and can be easily transported for on-site editing. The powerful hardware of the Mac Studio enhances the editing "feel" and allows for faster rendering and smoother playback. The Mac Studio is a great investment for video editing needs and offers a future-proof solution for years to come.
Apple M1 Ultra vs M1 Max: Head-to-head shootout with photo and video editing apps
The Apple M1 Ultra is twice as powerful as the M1 Max, but the performance improvements vary across different photo and video editing apps. In Lightroom Classic, the M1 Ultra is significantly faster, providing a 2x improvement in performance. However, in Capture One Pro, there is almost no difference in performance between the M1 Max and M1 Ultra. Photoshop shows a small performance difference, while Premiere Pro and Final Cut Pro have modest improvements. Overall, the M1 Ultra is not worth the extra cost for most users, unless they heavily rely on Lightroom Classic.
+ 9
It's finally here! Zen 3 Threadripper 5000... Pro - YouTube
www.youtube.com
AMD has announced the launch of Zen 3 Threadripper Pro 5000, which offers up to 64 cores and extra Zen 3 cores compared to the previous generation. The CPUs come in five SKUs, with the top model being the 64-core Threadripper Pro 5995 WX. The chips have professional features and are aimed at system integrators in industries like 3D rendering and VFX. The first system to feature these chips will be the Lenovo ThinkStation P620. The pricing has not been announced yet. The review also mentions the comparison with Intel's Xeon W 3300 series and the lack of stacked V-Cache in these chips. The review concludes that while the regular Threadripper platform may be dead, the Threadripper Pro platform may have some longevity.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX CPU Appears In ...
www.youtube.com
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX CPU has appeared in a benchmark, indicating it will be the flagship processor for the upcoming Ryzen Threadripper 5000 series. The benchmark tested the processor in photogrammetry software and included rendering times for various tests. The Threadripper 5000 series is expected to be fully compatible with existing TRX80 and WRX80 motherboards and is set to launch in Q4 2021.
An EPYC History of AMD Threadripper - YouTube
www.youtube.com
The Gigabyte TRX 50 AORUS motherboard is compatible with the new AMD Threadripper 7000 processors, which offer up to 64 cores and support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5. The motherboard has impressive features such as three PCIe x16 slots, four M.2 slots, and a 28-phase VRM. The review also compares the performance of different Threadripper generations and Intel Xeon processors. The Threadripper 7000 series shows significant improvements in performance and power consumption. Overall, the review highlights the impressive capabilities of the new Threadripper processors and the high-end features of the Gigabyte motherboard.
Which AMD Threadripper Pro Workstation is Better? - YouTube
The review compares two high-end workstations, one from Lenovo and one from Super Micro, both based on the AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX processor. The Lenovo system is smaller and has a three-year on-site warranty, while the Super Micro system is larger and offers more expansion slots and features. In terms of performance, the Super Micro system was slightly faster when heat soaked. The Lenovo system uses AMD PSB, which vendor locks the CPU, while the Super Micro system does not. Overall, the Super Micro system is considered the better option due to its lower price, better cooling, and more expandability.
24-Core Battle: AMD Threadripper Pro 5965WX vs Intel i9 13900k | Which is better for creators?
The AMD Threadripper Pro 5965WX is a 24-core CPU that offers features like high PCIe lane support and a large RAM capacity. It performs well in multi-core tasks but falls behind in single-core performance. It is a good option for creators who need a lot of RAM and GPU expansion. However, it is more expensive than mainstream high-end processors.
BEST CREATOR CPU on planet BUT it's NOT what you think! | 64-Core 5995wx revisited
The Ryzen Threadripper 5995WX CPU is one of the most expensive CPUs on the market, costing around $7,000. It has 64 cores and 128 threads, making it a powerful option for creators. It is compared to mainstream CPUs like the Ryzen 9 5950X and the Intel i9-13900K. The 5995WX has impressive specs, including support for 128 PCIe lanes and up to two terabytes of DDR4 RAM. It performs well in CPU rendering and 3D modeling applications, but falls behind in photo and video editing tasks due to its single-core performance. Overall, it is best suited for scientific research, server-grade workstations, and high-end desktop PCs.
REVEALED 👉 World's MOST POWERFUL Creator PC! | AMD 5995wx + 3x RTX 4090 Workstation [OPPENHEIMER PC]
Mac Studio M1 Ultra | A MUSIC Production Beast or Bust?
The reviewer has been using the new Apple Mac Studio with the M1 Ultra chip for a month. They conducted a test to see how many tracks it takes to overload the system. They were able to stack up to 140 tracks without any issues. The reviewer also discussed their experience migrating from an old Mac and mentioned that the Mac Studio solved all their pressing issues. They highlighted the speed benefits, improved productivity, and lack of crashes compared to their old machine. The reviewer acknowledged the lack of expandability in the Mac Studio but concluded that it was worth the purchase for its modern features and efficiency.
M1 Ultra: A Fast-Performing Powerhouse! Hands-on Review
The M1 Ultra is a powerful system designed for professionals, developers, and creatives. It features the new M1 Ultra chip, which is the fastest processor Apple has ever made. With up to 20 CPU cores, 64-core GPU, and up to 128GB of unified memory, it offers impressive performance for video editing and high-resolution photo editing. The Mac Studio also has extensive connectivity options, including Thunderbolt 4 ports, USB-A ports, an SDXC card reader, and a 10-gigabit Ethernet port. The 27-inch Studio Display is a gorgeous 5K monitor with a 12-megapixel camera, three-microphone array, and spatial audio support. The Mac Studio is compact, quiet, and has a unique cooling solution. It delivers smooth playback and fast encoding in video applications like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere. Overall, it is a powerhouse for creative professionals.
Mac Studio Ultimate Comparison - Is M1 Ultra Worth it?!
The review compares three models of the Mac Studio: the base model with M1 Max, the middle model with M1 Ultra, and the final model with double the memory. The M1 Ultra models have better cooling systems and more Thunderbolt ports. In terms of performance, there is no difference in single-core tasks, but the M1 Ultras have almost perfect scaling in multi-core tests. However, there are diminishing returns in GPU performance, with the 64-core M1 Ultra only being 17% faster than the 48-core model. In photo editing, the M1 Ultras are faster, but there are diminishing returns in panorama and Photoshop tests. In programming, the M1 Ultras have limited improvement in Xcode, but significant scaling in music production using Logic Pro. In GPU-based tests, there are diminishing returns in Geekbench and 3DMark, but better scaling in 8K redraw. In video editing, there are no significant differences in H.264 exports, but the M1 Ultras are faster in HEVC exports. However, the GPUs are throttled in intense tests, resulting in disappointing performance. Overall, the M1 Max base model offers the best value for common tasks, while the M1 Ultra is worth considering for CPU-intensive tasks. The 64-core model is not recommended for most users.
We threw everything at the M1 Ultra | Upscaled - YouTube
The M1 Ultra is Apple's fastest computer yet, with two M1 Max chips fused together. It has 20 CPU cores, up to 64 graphics cores, and up to 128GB of RAM. In tests, the M1 Ultra performed close to twice as fast as the M1 Max in CPU-intensive tasks, but the GPU performance was not as impressive. The M1 Ultra excelled in video editing software like Premiere Pro and Resolve, but struggled with some AI and gaming tests. Overall, the M1 Ultra is a powerful desktop option, but its high price may not be worth it for everyone.
The TRUTH About The Mac Studio (M1 Ultra) - YouTube
The Mac Studio is a compact desktop PC with impressive performance. It has a minimal design and comes with a good selection of ports. The M1 Ultra version offers even better performance than the M1 Max. Benchmarks show that it performs well in real-world tasks like video editing and photo editing. The Mac Studio is also energy-efficient and consumes less power compared to other desktop PCs. The price starts at around $2,000 for the M1 Max version and doubles for the M1 Ultra version. The Studio Display is a 27-inch 5K retina display that complements the Mac Studio. It has a premium build and integrated features like a webcam and speakers. Overall, the Mac Studio and Studio Display offer a powerful and cohesive setup for professionals.
Mac Studio Review — M1 Max vs. M1 Ultra! - YouTube
The Mac Studio with M1 Ultra is a powerful and efficient machine that offers double the CPU, GPU, and memory of the M1 Max. It has two secure enclaves, two ANE blocks, and double the ML controllers. The M1 Ultra also has double the media engines, allowing for up to 18 simultaneous streams of 8K ProRes. The Mac Studio has a range of ports, including Thunderbolt and USB-C, but some features like the card reader and HDMI port remain unchanged. The Mac Studio is a great option for professionals who need high-performance capabilities.
M1 Ultra Mac Studio - I've Made a HUGE Mistake! - YouTube
The M1 Ultra Mac Studio is a powerful computer that the reviewer had been dreaming of for a long time. It has impressive CPU performance and is an engineering marvel in terms of size and cooling. However, the GPU power is less impressive and the reviewer didn't see significant speed improvements in their workflow compared to the M1 Max. The transition to Apple Silicon has made it clear that you don't have to spend a lot of money on a Mac to get good performance. The M1 chip revolutionized the Mac and lower-cost machines now offer excellent performance. The reviewer advises waiting for the next generation of Apple Silicon with higher clock speeds for noticeable performance gains.
Mac Studio Review - 6 Months Later - YouTube
The Mac Studio is a powerful machine for creators, with the M1 Ultra chip offering impressive performance. However, the upgrade may not be worth the extra cost for everyone. The multi-core performance is where the M1 Ultra shines, but for everyday tasks and YouTube videos, the M1 Max may be sufficient. The RAM is not upgradable, so choosing the right amount is important. The Mac Studio has a sleek design, convenient SD card reader, and plenty of ports. Gaming on the Mac Studio is not ideal, and dust accumulation and ergonomics can be issues. Bluetooth connectivity can also be problematic. Overall, the Mac Studio is recommended for those who need more power for intensive tasks, but the M1 Max configuration is likely sufficient for most users.
Mac Studio M1 Ultra Long Term Review (2 Months later)
The Mac Studio M1 Ultra Long Term Review highlights several important points. The reviewer mentions that the performance of the M1 Ultra chip is mixed, as it is not as fast as Apple advertised. The GPU is not as good as the RTX 3090, and the storage upgrade options are limited and expensive. The design is praised for its sleek and minimalistic look. The Mac Studio is recommended for creatives already in the Apple ecosystem, but Windows users may find better performance and value with PCs. The reviewer also mentions issues with Apple's scaling and the high price tag of the Mac Studio. Overall, the review suggests that the Mac Studio may not be the best option for everyone.
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 6 Months Later - YouTube
The reviewer discusses their experience with the Mac Studio M1 Ultra after six months of use. They encountered issues with the Mac Studio and the studio display not working properly, but Apple released a software update to fix it. Initially, programs running on Rosetta 2 had problems, but they improved over time. The reviewer recommends the Ultra chip for creative professionals working on large projects, while the Max chip is suitable for medium-sized creators. The Ultra chip can handle larger files and a greater variety of programs simultaneously. The reviewer believes the Mac Studio with the Ultra chip is worth the price tag, as the market has caught up with the hardware and performance has significantly improved.
+ 14
Feature | AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX | Apple M1 Ultra |
---|---|---|
Total Clock Speed | 172.8 GHz | 59.2 GHz |
RAM Speed Max | 3200 MHz | 6400 MHz |
CPU Threads | 128 threads | 20 threads |
Semiconductor Size | 7 nm | 5 nm |
Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz | N/A |
PassMark Score | 95655 | 41261 |
L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB |
L3 Cache | 256 MB | N/A |
TDP | 280 W | 96 W |
Integrated Graphics | No | Yes |
PCIe Version | 4 | N/A |
Transistor Count | 33200 million | 114000 million |
Maximum Memory Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 800 GB/s |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Max Memory Size | 2000 GB | 128 GB |
ECC Memory Support | Yes | No |
Multithreading | Yes | No |
Performance and Capabilities:
Efficiency and Power:
Technology and Innovation:
Use Cases and Suitability:
For Professional Workstations and Servers:
For Creative Professionals and High-End Content Creation:
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.