AMD Epyc 9754 vs Intel Xeon W9-3495X
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD Bergamo & Genoa-X EPYC Server CPUs Crush The Competition With Sheer Performance & Efficiency Dominance
wccftech.com
AMD's EPYC Bergamo and Genoa-X CPUs have been praised for their exceptional performance and efficiency. The Genoa-X chips offer up to 96 cores and 1.1 GB of L3 cache, while Bergamo boasts up to 128 Zen 4C cores. Both CPUs outperform Intel's Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPU and offer significant power efficiency improvements. AMD's dominance in the server market is expected to continue with the upcoming Sierra Forrest and Siena lineup.
Running The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs With A 320W cTDP To Enhance Power Efficiency Review
www.phoronix.com
The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs can be run with a 320W cTDP to enhance power efficiency. Lowering the TDP to 320W delivers similar performance across workloads while reducing CPU power consumption. The EPYC 9754 2P at 320W runs at around 99% the performance of the default 360W configuration, with up to 5% lower power consumption. This option is beneficial for maximizing power efficiency in server environments. Additionally, switching to a 400W TDP increases performance by about 6% with a 10% power increase. AMD's cTDP options allow for fine-tuning servers for maximum performance or squeezing out the most possible performance.
AMD Bergamo And Genoa-X Performance Review: EPYC Chips For Big Iron Workloads - Page 2
hothardware.com
The review compares the performance of AMD's Bergamo and Genoa-X EPYC chips for big iron workloads. The tests were conducted using Ubuntu Server 22.04 with the 5.15.0-76-generic Linux kernel. The AMD EPYC 9754 performed well in Coremark, 7-Zip decompression, and Blender 3D rendering. The EPYC 9684X excelled in 7-Zip compression and Linux kernel compilation. In terms of video encoding, the EPYC 9654 performed best in 4K x264 encoding, while the EPYC 9754 lagged behind. For database processing, the Bergamo and Genoa-X chips outperformed Intel's offerings in both read-only and read-write workloads. However, in web server benchmarks, Intel's chips performed better, particularly in NGINX. Intel's accelerators also provided an advantage in hashing algorithms.
4th Gen Intel Xeon W9-3495X – It’s a monster - KitGuru
The 4th Gen Intel Xeon W9-3495X is a powerful CPU that performs well in gaming, as shown in Borderlands 3 and Far Cry 6 at 1440p. It competes with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and delivers good performance with its high clock speeds and 3D cache in Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Intel Xeon w9 3495X and w9 3475X Review
The Intel Xeon w9 3495X and w9 3475X are powerful processors that excel in 3D rendering but fall short in video encoding and gaming. They offer impressive performance in Cinebench and Blender, rendering scenes quickly. However, video encoding benchmarks did not utilize the high core count effectively. Gaming performance was also lacking, as games are designed for consoles with fewer cores. These processors are best suited for 3D rendering and specific video encoders that can take advantage of the thread count. Overclocking the Xeon w9-3475X showed that some benchmarks prioritize clock speed over threads. Overall, these processors offer unmatched speed for those with the right requirements and budget.
Intel Xeon w9 3495X and w9 3475X Review
The Intel Xeon w9-3475X and w9-3495X are high-end processors aimed at demanding users in fields like CAD and rendering. With 72 and 112 threads respectively, these CPUs offer extreme performance for intensive tasks. They have a base frequency of 2.2 GHz and 1.9 GHz, and a maximum turbo power of 360W and 420W. The Intel Xeon w9-3495X is priced at $5889, while the w9-3475X is priced at $3739. These processors are not recommended for gaming or casual use, but rather for professionals who require top-tier performance.
Review: Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE and Intel W9-3495X
The Intel Xeon W9-3495X processor is the top-of-the-range model in the Xeon W-3400 series, with 56 cores and 112 threads. It has a base frequency of 1.9 GHz and can boost up to 4.8 GHz. The CPU-Z tool confirms that the processor is recognized correctly. During testing, all 56 cores were active and performed well, completing the R23 benchmark quickly. The temperatures were excellent, and the Noctua cooler kept the cores at 2.88 GHz.
4th Gen Intel Xeon W9-3495X – It’s a monster
The 4th Gen Intel Xeon W9-3495X is a powerful workstation CPU with 56 cores. It performs well in Cinebench and Blender tests, but its power draw is high and clock speeds are limited. The CPU temperatures are impressively low. The price is competitive with AMD, but Intel needs to improve its 5th Gen technology.
+ 5
AI COMPARISON
Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9754 | Intel Xeon W9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 256 threads | 112 threads |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | Not specified |
| Total Clock Speed | 288 GHz | 106.4 GHz |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 8 |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 105 MB |
| Max Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 Cache | 8192 KB | 4480 KB |
| CPU TDP | 360W (can be adjusted to 320W) | 350W |
| Integrated Graphics | No | No |
| Max Memory Size | 6000 GB | 4000 GB |
| Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB | 112 MB |
| Memory ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
| Instruction Sets | Extensive (incl. AVX, AES, FMA3) | Extensive (incl. AVX, AES, FMA3) |
Summary
Performance and Efficiency:
- AMD Epyc 9754 is highly lauded for its performance and efficiency in server environments, delivering top-tier performance particularly in multi-threaded applications and compute-heavy tasks such as 3D rendering and decompression. It offers a significantly higher number of threads (256) and superior memory bandwidth.
- Intel Xeon W9-3495X excels in high-frequency demands with a turbo of up to 4.8 GHz and performs exceptionally in 3D rendering tasks, but it shows limitations in high-core count optimizations for gaming and certain encoding tasks.
Power Consumption and Cooling:
- AMD Epyc 9754 can adjust its TDP for power efficiency, making it particularly suitable for environments where power efficiency is crucial, like data centers.
- The Intel W9-3495X has a slightly lower default TDP but lacks the flexible power efficiency features of the AMD. It maintains good temperatures even under load, which speaks well for its cooling efficiency.
Target Applications and Market Fit:
- The AMD Epyc is suitable for large-scale server deployments where multithreading and high memory demands are typical, outperforming Intel in various server-related benchmarks.
- Intel’s W9-3495X, while powerful in specific scenarios like 3D rendering and professional workstations for CAD and rendering tasks, may not be cost-effective for every user, particularly not for gamers or general low-core-demand applications.
Recommendations
- For Data Centers and High-Performance Computing:
- AMD Epyc 9753 is the preferred choice due to its superior multithreading capability and energy efficiency.
- For Professional Workstations (3D Rendering, CAD):
- Intel Xeon W9-3495X might be preferable for tasks that can leverage its high turbo clock speeds and substantial core count, provided the tasks are optimized for such a setup.
- General and Mixed Usage:
- Consider AMD for a more versatile and power-efficient solution across a broader range of applications, especially where power consumption and cost-effectiveness are concerned.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
