AMD Epyc 9754 vs Intel Xeon W7-3465X
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD Bergamo & Genoa-X EPYC Server CPUs Crush The Competition With Sheer Performance & Efficiency Dominance
wccftech.com
AMD's EPYC Bergamo and Genoa-X CPUs have been praised for their exceptional performance and efficiency. The Genoa-X chips offer up to 96 cores and 1.1 GB of L3 cache, while Bergamo boasts up to 128 Zen 4C cores. Both CPUs outperform Intel's Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPU and offer significant power efficiency improvements. AMD's dominance in the server market is expected to continue with the upcoming Sierra Forrest and Siena lineup.
Running The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs With A 320W cTDP To Enhance Power Efficiency Review
www.phoronix.com
The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs can be run with a 320W cTDP to enhance power efficiency. Lowering the TDP to 320W delivers similar performance across workloads while reducing CPU power consumption. The EPYC 9754 2P at 320W runs at around 99% the performance of the default 360W configuration, with up to 5% lower power consumption. This option is beneficial for maximizing power efficiency in server environments. Additionally, switching to a 400W TDP increases performance by about 6% with a 10% power increase. AMD's cTDP options allow for fine-tuning servers for maximum performance or squeezing out the most possible performance.
AMD Bergamo And Genoa-X Performance Review: EPYC Chips For Big Iron Workloads - Page 2
hothardware.com
The review compares the performance of AMD's Bergamo and Genoa-X EPYC chips for big iron workloads. The tests were conducted using Ubuntu Server 22.04 with the 5.15.0-76-generic Linux kernel. The AMD EPYC 9754 performed well in Coremark, 7-Zip decompression, and Blender 3D rendering. The EPYC 9684X excelled in 7-Zip compression and Linux kernel compilation. In terms of video encoding, the EPYC 9654 performed best in 4K x264 encoding, while the EPYC 9754 lagged behind. For database processing, the Bergamo and Genoa-X chips outperformed Intel's offerings in both read-only and read-write workloads. However, in web server benchmarks, Intel's chips performed better, particularly in NGINX. Intel's accelerators also provided an advantage in hashing algorithms.
Intel Xeon W7-3465X vs Intel Xeon W9-3495X: What is the difference?
The Intel Xeon W7-3465X and Intel Xeon W9-3495X are compared based on their thermal design power (TDP), performance, power consumption, chipset, form factor, PCIe support, RAM capacity, operating temperature, integrated graphics, DirectX version, and transistor count. The W9-3495X has a higher TDP, better performance, and lower power consumption. It also supports newer versions of PCIe and DirectX, has a larger RAM capacity, and a higher transistor count.
SkatterBencher #63: Intel Xeon w7-3465X Overclocked to 5100 MHz
The SkatterBencher #63 review discusses the overclocking of the Intel Xeon w7-3465X processor. The review covers the hardware specifications, including the number of cores, base frequency, and boost frequencies. It also explains the different overclocking strategies used, such as ASUS MultiCore Enhancement and ASUS Memory Presets. The review provides benchmark results for each overclocking strategy and discusses the voltage and power requirements. Overall, the review highlights the performance improvements achieved through overclocking the Intel Xeon w7-3465X processor.
Xeon w7-3465X [in 3 benchmarks]
The Xeon w7-3465X is a professional desktop processor with 28 cores and 56 threads. It is based on Intel 7 manufacturing technology and has a max turbo frequency of 4800 MHz. It is compatible with FCLGA4677 socket and supports DDR5-4800 memory. The processor provides good benchmark performance at 43.54% of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. It supports various instruction set extensions and virtualization technologies. The PCIe version is 5.0 with 112 lanes. The benchmark performance is measured through Passmark, GeekBench 5 Single-Core, and GeekBench 5 Multi-Core tests.
Intel Xeon w7-3465X
The Intel Xeon w7-3465X CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It achieves high speeds in these tasks, such as 246,866 MOps/Sec for integer math and 192,185 MOps/Sec for floating-point math. It also excels in data compression with 967,030 KBytes/Sec and extended instructions with 83,086 Million Matrices/Sec. However, there is not enough data to create a distribution graph for its CPU mark.
+ 4
AI COMPARISON
AMD Epyc 9754 VS Intel Xeon W7-3465X Comparison Report
Attributes Comparison
| Attribute | AMD Epyc 9754 | Intel Xeon W7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 256 threads | 56 threads |
| Total Clock Speed | 288 GHz | 70 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| CPU TDP | 360W | 300W |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 75 MB |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 8 |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB | 56 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| Max Memory Size | 6000 GB | 4000 GB |
| Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
| Instruction Sets | mmx, sse_4_1, sse_4_2, avx, avx_2, aes, f16c, fma_3 | mmx, f16c, fma_3, aes, avx, avx_2, sse_4_1, sse_4_2 |
| Mem EEC | True | True |
| 64-bit | True | True |
| NX Bit | True | True |
| Unlocked Multiplier | False | True |
| DirectX Version R | None | None |
Summary
The AMD Epyc 9754 and Intel Xeon W7-3465X represent powerful options in their respective categories.
AMD Epyc 9754 excels with its massive core count (256 threads), high total clock speed (288 GHz), and extensive L3 cache (256 MB). It's designed for data-intensive tasks and server applications, boasting superior memory bandwidth and scalability with DDR5 support and 6000 GB max memory size. It's optimized for efficiency with a TDP of 360W.
Intel Xeon W7-3465X offers a balanced performance with 56 threads and a turbo frequency up to 4.8 GHz. It features a moderate TDP of 300W, suitable for professional systems requiring reliable processing power. The processor supports DDR5 memory, PCIe 5.0, and includes advanced instruction sets for enhanced performance across various workloads.
Recommendation
-
AMD Epyc 9754: Ideal for data centers, cloud computing, and tasks requiring extensive parallel processing such as virtualization, AI, and scientific computing.
-
Intel Xeon W7-3465X: Suitable for professional workstations and tasks like content creation, engineering simulations, and moderate server duties that benefit from high clock speeds and reliable performance.
Choose AMD Epyc 9754 for scalability and raw compute power, while opting for Intel Xeon W7-3465X if you need a robust workstation CPU with excellent single-threaded performance and overclocking capabilities.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
