AMD Bergamo & Genoa-X EPYC Server CPUs Crush The Competition With Sheer Performance & Efficiency Dominance
wccftech.com
AMD's EPYC Bergamo and Genoa-X CPUs have been praised for their exceptional performance and efficiency. The Genoa-X chips offer up to 96 cores and 1.1 GB of L3 cache, while Bergamo boasts up to 128 Zen 4C cores. Both CPUs outperform Intel's Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPU and offer significant power efficiency improvements. AMD's dominance in the server market is expected to continue with the upcoming Sierra Forrest and Siena lineup.
Running The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs With A 320W cTDP To Enhance Power Efficiency Review
www.phoronix.com
The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs can be run with a 320W cTDP to enhance power efficiency. Lowering the TDP to 320W delivers similar performance across workloads while reducing CPU power consumption. The EPYC 9754 2P at 320W runs at around 99% the performance of the default 360W configuration, with up to 5% lower power consumption. This option is beneficial for maximizing power efficiency in server environments. Additionally, switching to a 400W TDP increases performance by about 6% with a 10% power increase. AMD's cTDP options allow for fine-tuning servers for maximum performance or squeezing out the most possible performance.
AMD Bergamo And Genoa-X Performance Review: EPYC Chips For Big Iron Workloads - Page 2
hothardware.com
The review compares the performance of AMD's Bergamo and Genoa-X EPYC chips for big iron workloads. The tests were conducted using Ubuntu Server 22.04 with the 5.15.0-76-generic Linux kernel. The AMD EPYC 9754 performed well in Coremark, 7-Zip decompression, and Blender 3D rendering. The EPYC 9684X excelled in 7-Zip compression and Linux kernel compilation. In terms of video encoding, the EPYC 9654 performed best in 4K x264 encoding, while the EPYC 9754 lagged behind. For database processing, the Bergamo and Genoa-X chips outperformed Intel's offerings in both read-only and read-write workloads. However, in web server benchmarks, Intel's chips performed better, particularly in NGINX. Intel's accelerators also provided an advantage in hashing algorithms.
Intel Xeon E-2388G Benchmark, Test and specs
The Intel Xeon E-2388G is a 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the 3rd generation of the Intel Xeon E series. It has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz and a turbo frequency of 5.10 GHz. The processor scored 1,722 points in the Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark and 10,358 points in the multi-core benchmark. It has Intel UHD Graphics P750 with a frequency of 0.35 GHz and a turbo frequency of 1.30 GHz. The processor supports up to 128 GB of DDR4-3200 memory in dual-channel configuration. It has a thermal design power of 95 W and uses the LGA 1200 socket. The Intel Xeon E-2388G supports AES-NI, virtualization, and instruction sets like SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, and AVX-512.
Intel Xeon E2388G Processor 16M Cache 3.20 GHz Product Specifications
Intel Xeon E-2388G vs Intel Core i7-12700K Benchmark, comparison and differences
The Intel Xeon E-2388G has 8 cores with 16 threads and a maximum frequency of 5.10 GHz. It supports up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i7-12700K has 12 cores with 20 threads and a maximum frequency of 5.00 GHz. It also supports up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Xeon E-2388G was released in Q3/2021, while the Core i7-12700K was released in Q4/2021. The Xeon E-2388G has a TDP of 95 W, while the Core i7-12700K has a TDP of 125 W. The Xeon E-2388G has integrated graphics with a GPU frequency of 0.35 GHz (1.30 GHz Turbo), while the Core i7-12700K has integrated graphics with a GPU frequency of 0.30 GHz (1.50 GHz Turbo). The Xeon E-2388G supports ECC memory, while the Core i7-12700K does not.
E-2388G vs E-2288G [3-Benchmark Showdown]
The Xeon E-2388G processor outperforms the Xeon E-2288G in terms of value for money, with a 872% better value. The E-2388G has a higher base and boost clock speed, as well as a larger L3 cache. It also supports more advanced technologies and extensions, including AVX-512 and SGX. Both processors have the same power consumption and support DDR4 memory. The E-2388G performs better in synthetic benchmarks, with a 37% higher combined benchmark score and a 97% higher score in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
Intel Xeon E-2388G @ 3.20GHz
The Intel Xeon E-2388G @ 3.20GHz offers strong performance compared to other CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. It also provides good value for money, with a high CPUMark per dollar ratio. The pricing history data shows the price for a single processor.
Xeon E-2388G [in 3 benchmarks]
The Xeon E-2388G is a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. It has a max turbo frequency of 5100 MHz and supports DDR4-3200 memory. It provides poor benchmark performance compared to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. The processor is compatible with FCLGA1200 socket type and has a TDP of 95 Watt. It supports various technological capabilities and security features. The integrated GPU is Intel UHD Graphics P750 with a max video memory of 64 GB. The processor has a combined benchmark performance rating and has been tested in Passmark and GeekBench 5 benchmarks.
Intel Xeon E-2288G Review 8 Cores and 5GHz in the Entry Segment
The Intel Xeon E-2288G is a significant product in the entry-level segment, offering 8 cores and a base clock of 3.7GHz. It competes with lower-end Intel Xeon Silver 4208 processors but delivers better performance. With a 95W TDP, it is suitable for edge server deployments. The CPU also has an integrated GPU, reducing system power consumption. In terms of benchmarks, the Xeon E-2288G outperforms the Silver 4208 and even competes with the AMD EPYC 7232P. Overall, this chip is a game-changer in its segment.
+ 7
Feature | AMD Epyc 9754 | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
---|---|---|
Total Clock Speed | 288 GHz | 25.6 GHz |
CPU Threads | 256 threads | 16 threads |
PCIe | 5 | 4 |
Memory Channels | 12 | 2 |
Maximum Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | Not specified |
DDR Version | 5 | 4 |
L3 Cache | 256 MB | 16 MB |
L1 Cache | 8192 KB | 512 KB |
L2 Cache | 128 MB | 4 MB |
L2 Cache per Core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core |
CPU TDP | 360W (can be configured to 320W) | 95W |
Turbo | 3.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
Maximum Memory Size | 6000 GB | 128 GB |
Integrated Graphics | No | Yes (Intel UHD Graphics P750) |
DirectX Version | Not supported | 12.1 |
Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
Memory ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
Performance: The AMD Epyc 9754 offers vastly superior core counts and cache sizes, making it highly suitable for compute-heavy tasks like multi-threaded CPU tests, decompression, 3D rendering, and database processing. Its large number of threads and high memory bandwidth enhance its performance in server environments and data centers. The Intel Xeon E-2388G, with its lower core count and cache, is more suited to less demanding processing tasks but excels in environments requiring integrated graphics.
Power Efficiency: AMD Epyc 9754 is configurable in terms of power usage, allowing a balance between performance and energy consumption, which can be a significant factor in large-scale deployments. Intel Xeon E-2388G has a much lower TDP, which might be beneficial for smaller, power-sensitive setups.
Graphics and Display: Intel's Xeon E-2388G has an edge in integrated graphics, featuring the Intel UHD Graphics P750, suitable for tasks requiring GPU support such as video playback and basic graphics processing. AMD's offering does not include integrated graphics, focusing purely on processing power.
Memory and PCI Express: AMD supports faster RAM and more PCIe lanes, crucial for systems needing high throughput and connectivity, such as advanced storage solutions and external graphics processing units. Intel's processor supports less memory and fewer PCIe lanes, limiting its use in high-end, multi-peripheral setups.
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.