AMD Epyc 9734 vs AMD Epyc 9754
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD EPYC 9734
www.cpu-world.com
The AMD EPYC 9734 CPU is not listed in the CPU ID database. It belongs to the EPYC 9004 series family and has 2242.2 GHz frequency. It has 256 MB L3 cache and a TDP of 256 MB. It is one of the slower CPUs in the category.
AMD EPYC 9734 Benchmark, Test and specs
www.cpu-monkey.com
The AMD EPYC 9734 is a 112-core processor with 224 threads. It is based on the 4th generation of the AMD EPYC series and requires a mainboard with the socket SP5. It has a frequency of 2.20 GHz and a turbo frequency of 3.00 GHz. It supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels and has a maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The TDP is 340 W and it is built on a 5 nm chip design. It supports AES-NI, virtualization, and x86-64 instruction set. The release price is $11900.
AMD Epyc 9734 vs AMD Epyc 9754: What is the difference?
versus.com
The AMD Epyc 9734 and AMD Epyc 9754 are processors with different thermal design power (TDP) and semiconductor sizes. The Epyc 9754 has a higher TDP and potentially more transistors, indicating better performance. It also supports newer versions of PCIe and DirectX. The Epyc 9734 has an unknown semiconductor size and DirectX version. Both processors have unknown CPU temperatures.
AMD Bergamo & Genoa-X EPYC Server CPUs Crush The Competition With Sheer Performance & Efficiency Dominance
AMD's EPYC Bergamo and Genoa-X CPUs have been praised for their exceptional performance and efficiency. The Genoa-X chips offer up to 96 cores and 1.1 GB of L3 cache, while Bergamo boasts up to 128 Zen 4C cores. Both CPUs outperform Intel's Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPU and offer significant power efficiency improvements. AMD's dominance in the server market is expected to continue with the upcoming Sierra Forrest and Siena lineup.
Running The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs With A 320W cTDP To Enhance Power Efficiency Review
The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs can be run with a 320W cTDP to enhance power efficiency. Lowering the TDP to 320W delivers similar performance across workloads while reducing CPU power consumption. The EPYC 9754 2P at 320W runs at around 99% the performance of the default 360W configuration, with up to 5% lower power consumption. This option is beneficial for maximizing power efficiency in server environments. Additionally, switching to a 400W TDP increases performance by about 6% with a 10% power increase. AMD's cTDP options allow for fine-tuning servers for maximum performance or squeezing out the most possible performance.
AMD Bergamo And Genoa-X Performance Review: EPYC Chips For Big Iron Workloads - Page 2
The review compares the performance of AMD's Bergamo and Genoa-X EPYC chips for big iron workloads. The tests were conducted using Ubuntu Server 22.04 with the 5.15.0-76-generic Linux kernel. The AMD EPYC 9754 performed well in Coremark, 7-Zip decompression, and Blender 3D rendering. The EPYC 9684X excelled in 7-Zip compression and Linux kernel compilation. In terms of video encoding, the EPYC 9654 performed best in 4K x264 encoding, while the EPYC 9754 lagged behind. For database processing, the Bergamo and Genoa-X chips outperformed Intel's offerings in both read-only and read-write workloads. However, in web server benchmarks, Intel's chips performed better, particularly in NGINX. Intel's accelerators also provided an advantage in hashing algorithms.
+ 3
AI COMPARISON
AMD Epyc 9734 VS AMD Epyc 9754
Product Attributes Comparison
| Attribute | AMD Epyc 9734 | AMD Epyc 9754 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 224 threads | 256 threads |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s |
| Total Clock Speed | 246.4 GHz | 288 GHz |
| PCIe | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 12 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| L1 Cache | 7168 KB | 8192 KB |
| CPU TDP | 340W | 360W |
| 64-bit | True | True |
| Integrated Graphics | False | False |
| DirectX Version | None | None |
| Turbo Frequency | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 112 MB | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache per Core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core |
| Unlocked Multiplier | False | False |
| L3 Cache per Core | 2.29 MB/core | 2 MB/core |
| ECC Memory Support | True | True |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Max Memory Size | 6000 GB | 6000 GB |
| Multithreading | True | True |
| Instruction Sets | mmx, sse_4_1, sse_4_2, aes, avx, avx_2, f16c, fma_3 | mmx, sse_4_1, sse_4_2, avx, avx_2, aes, f16c, fma_3 |
| NX bit | True | True |
Summary
The AMD Epyc 9734 and AMD Epyc 9754 are high-performance server processors with significant similarities in their architecture and capabilities. Both models feature 12 memory channels, support DDR5 memory, and offer extensive multi-threading with 224 and 256 threads respectively. They share identical instruction sets and memory capacities up to 6000 GB. The Epyc 9754 edges out slightly in clock speed and cache sizes, with a higher TDP of 360W compared to 340W for the Epyc 9734. Both CPUs are designed for compute-intensive tasks but differ slightly in power efficiency and specific workload optimizations.
Recommendations
-
AMD Epyc 9734: Ideal for applications where power consumption needs to be slightly lower without sacrificing substantial performance. Suitable for environments needing robust multi-threaded processing capabilities with moderate clock speeds.
-
AMD Epyc 9754: Recommended for users requiring the highest compute performance available in AMD's Epyc lineup, especially for tasks demanding higher clock speeds and larger cache sizes. Suitable for data centers and enterprise environments with intensive workload demands.
These recommendations cater to different needs in server performance, balancing between power efficiency and maximum computing power depending on specific use cases.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
