AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" AVX-512 Performance Analysis
www.phoronix.com
The AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" processor delivers impressive AVX-512 performance without negative impacts on power consumption or clock frequencies. The AVX-512 implementation in Zen 4 is robust and efficient, outperforming early generations of AVX-512 on Intel processors. The EPYC 9654 2P performance with and without AVX-512 usage was tested, showing the impact on raw performance, performance-per-Watt, CPU power consumption, core temperature, and peak frequency. The testing was done on Ubuntu 22.10 with GCC 12.2 and the Linux 6.1 kernel.
AMD EPYC 9654 shows what 96 Zen 4 cores can do by outbenching a Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30% on PassMark
www.notebookcheck.net
The AMD EPYC 9654 processor has outperformed its competitors on PassMark, surpassing the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30%. With its 96 Zen 4 cores, the EPYC 9654 achieved a CPU Mark of 124,119 points, setting a new benchmark. Although it has a slower single-thread score, the EPYC 9654 showcases AMD's excellence with its 5-nanometer manufacturing technology and support for AVX-512, PCIe 5.0, and DDR5. The EPYC 9654's reign may be short-lived as the upcoming 128-core EPYC 9754 chips are expected to showcase even greater capabilities.
AMD EPYC 9654P
www.cpubenchmark.net
The AMD EPYC 9654P CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It also has a decent single-thread performance. However, there is not enough data available to create a distribution graph for its CPU mark.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8581V
AMD Epyc 7713 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8581V: What is the difference?
The AMD Epyc 7713 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8581V CPUs have differences in their thermal design power (TDP), performance, power consumption, and graphics capabilities. The Epyc 7713 has an unknown DirectX version and OpenCL version, while the Xeon Platinum 8581V does not have an applicable OpenCL version. The number of transistors is also unknown for both CPUs.
Processor 300 vs Xeon Platinum 8581V
Xeon Platinum 8581V and Processor 300 are compared in terms of their market type, architecture, release date, and price. The technical specifications include the number of cores, threads, base frequency, cache size, and lithography. The compatibility information includes the socket type and power consumption. The technologies and extensions supported by both processors are listed, as well as their security and virtualization technologies. The memory specs and graphics specifications are also mentioned. However, no test results are available to judge the performance of these processors.
Intel 5th Gen Xeon “Emerald Rapids” CPUs Detailed: Up To 40% Faster Than Sapphire Rapids, Die-Shot Pictured
Intel 5th Gen Xeon 'Emerald Rapids' pushes up to 64 cores, 320MB L3 cache — new CPUs claim up to 1.4X higher performance than Sapphire Rapids
Intel will release its 5th Generation Xeon (Emerald Rapids) processors on December 14. These processors offer better performance per watt, more cores, and increased L3 cache compared to the previous generation. The Emerald Rapids chips have faster Raptor Cove cores and provide up to 1.4X higher performance in web, HPC, and media tasks. They also offer significant performance gains in AI. The processors support higher native DDR5 and have an enhanced Ultra Path Interconnect (UPI). The die shot reveals a two-die design with 33 cores per die, resulting in a maximum of 64 cores and 320MB of L3 cache. Emerald Rapids is drop-in compatible with Intel's current Eagle Stream platform.
+ 5
Feature | AMD Epyc 9654P | Intel Xeon Platinum 8581V |
---|---|---|
CPU Threads | 192 threads | 120 threads |
Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | Not specified |
Total Clock Speed | 230.4 GHz | 120 GHz |
PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
Memory Channels | 12 | 8 |
L3 Cache | 384 MB | 300 MB |
DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
Semiconductor Size | 6 nm | 10 nm |
CPU TDP | 360W | 270W |
Integrated Graphics | No | No |
Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7GHz | 3.9GHz |
Max Memory Size | 6000GB | 4000GB |
Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
Instruction Sets | mmx, f16c, fma_3, aes, avx, avx_2, sse_4_1, sse_4_2 | mmx, f16c, fma_3, aes, avx, avx_2, sse_4_1, sse_4_2 |
Max RAM Speed | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
ECC Memory Support | Yes | Yes |
Performance and Architecture:
Technology and Compatibility:
Power and Efficiency:
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.