AMD Epyc 9654P vs Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" AVX-512 Performance Analysis
www.phoronix.com
The AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" processor delivers impressive AVX-512 performance without negative impacts on power consumption or clock frequencies. The AVX-512 implementation in Zen 4 is robust and efficient, outperforming early generations of AVX-512 on Intel processors. The EPYC 9654 2P performance with and without AVX-512 usage was tested, showing the impact on raw performance, performance-per-Watt, CPU power consumption, core temperature, and peak frequency. The testing was done on Ubuntu 22.10 with GCC 12.2 and the Linux 6.1 kernel.
AMD EPYC 9654 shows what 96 Zen 4 cores can do by outbenching a Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30% on PassMark
www.notebookcheck.net
The AMD EPYC 9654 processor has outperformed its competitors on PassMark, surpassing the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30%. With its 96 Zen 4 cores, the EPYC 9654 achieved a CPU Mark of 124,119 points, setting a new benchmark. Although it has a slower single-thread score, the EPYC 9654 showcases AMD's excellence with its 5-nanometer manufacturing technology and support for AVX-512, PCIe 5.0, and DDR5. The EPYC 9654's reign may be short-lived as the upcoming 128-core EPYC 9754 chips are expected to showcase even greater capabilities.
AMD EPYC 9654P
www.cpubenchmark.net
The AMD EPYC 9654P CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It also has a decent single-thread performance. However, there is not enough data available to create a distribution graph for its CPU mark.
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz
The [Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz offers strong performance compared to other CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. It also provides good value for money, with a high CPUMark per dollar ratio. The pricing history data shows the price for a single processor, and for multiple processors, the price can be multiplied by the number of CPUs.
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y Benchmark, Test and specs
The Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y is a 24-core processor with 48 threads. It has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz and can reach a turbo frequency of 3.40 GHz. The processor supports a maximum of 6144 GB memory and has a TDP of 165 W. It uses the LGA 4189 socket and is based on the Ice Lake architecture. In the Geekbench 5 benchmark, it achieved a single-core score of 1,251 points and a multi-core score of 21,846 points.
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Intel Xeon Gold 6338: What is the difference?
The Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y and Intel Xeon Gold 6338 are compared based on their thermal design power (TDP), performance, power consumption, chipset, form factor, PCIe support, RAM capacity, integrated graphics, DirectX version, OpenCL version, and transistor count.
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Intel Xeon Gold 6330: What is the difference?
The Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y and Intel Xeon Gold 6330 have different thermal design power (TDP) and number of transistors. The 5318Y has an unknown CPU temperature and DirectX version, while the 6330 has an unknown OpenCL version. The 6330 also has integrated graphics.
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz
The Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz CPU performs well compared to other common CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. It also offers good value for money based on CPUMark per dollar. The pricing history data shows the price for a single processor.
Xeon Gold 5318Y [in 1 benchmark]
The Xeon Gold 5318Y is a desktop processor with 24 cores and 48 threads. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP architecture and has a maximum frequency of 3400 MHz. It has a TDP of 165 Watt and supports DDR4-2933 memory. The processor provides poor benchmark performance compared to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. It is compatible with FCLGA4189 socket type motherboards. It supports various technological capabilities and security technologies. The processor's benchmark performance is measured using the Passmark CPU Mark benchmark.
+ 6
AI COMPARISON
Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9654P | Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 192 threads | 48 threads |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 187.6 GB/s |
| Total Clock Speed | 230.4 GHz | 50.4 GHz |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 4 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 8 |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB | 36 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 4 |
| Semiconductor Size | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| CPU TDP | 360W | 165W |
| 64-bit Support | Yes | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | No | No |
| DirectX Version Supported | None | None |
| Turbo Speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Maximum Memory Size | 6000GB | 6000GB |
| Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
| Instruction Sets | mmx,f16c,fma_3,aes,avx,avx_2,sse_4_1,sse_4_2 | sse_4_2,sse_4_1,avx,aes,fma_3,f16c,mmx |
| Ram Speed Max | 4800 MHz | 2933 MHz |
| Passmark Score (if available) | 124,119 | 26,400 |
Product Summary
- Performance: The AMD Epyc 9654P vastly outperforms the Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y in most benchmarks, featuring a much higher total clock speed, significantly more CPU threads, and superior memory bandwidth. This makes it ideal for more intensive computing tasks and environments that require high concurrency and throughput.
- Technology: AMD's processor benefits from a newer 6 nm technology compared to Intel's 10 nm, contributing to potentially better efficiency and performance. The AMD also supports DDR5 RAM, which is faster and more power-efficient than the DDR4 supported by the Intel.
- Power Consumption and Heat: The Epyc 9654P has a higher thermal design power (360W) compared to the Xeon Gold 5318Y (165W), which may necessitate better cooling solutions and results in higher power consumption.
- Scalability: With more memory channels and support for higher speeds of RAM, the AMD processor is likely more scalable for expanding system resources than the Intel processor.
- PCIe Support: AMD supports PCIe 5.0, which is faster and offers more bandwidth than the PCIe 4.0 supported by Intel, important for systems with high-speed storage or multiple GPUs.
Recommendations
- For High-Performance Computing and Enterprise Servers: The AMD Epyc 9654P is highly recommended due to its superior performance metrics, making it suitable for demanding applications such as data analytics, virtualization, and high-performance computing.
- For Energy-Efficient Servers and Cost-Sensitive Environments: The Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y may be more suitable due to its lower power consumption and sufficient capabilities for moderate workloads.
- For Future-Proofing and Technological Edge: Organizations looking for longevity and cutting-edge technology in their server hardware should opt for the AMD Epyc 9654P, as it supports newer standards like PCIe 5.0 and DDR5.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
