AMD Epyc 9654 vs Intel Xeon W9-3495X
SOURCE ARTICLES
Comprehensive Guide to AMD’s EPYC 9654: The 96-Core Processor — Specs, Reviews, Workstations, and More
medium.com
Summary
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a powerful 96-core processor designed for high-performance computing tasks. It offers unparalleled multitasking capabilities with 192 threads and is compatible with enterprise-grade servers. The processor is engineered for optimal performance in heavy-duty computing tasks and has advanced power management features for energy efficiency. Cooling is crucial for this processor, and liquid cooling and advanced air-cooling solutions are recommended. The price of the EPYC 9654 varies depending on the retailer. It is ideal for professionals in fields like 3D rendering, video editing, and data analytics, as well as enterprises that require robust servers. The processor has received glowing reviews for its ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously and enhance professional productivity. While it can run games efficiently, it is considered an overinvestment for gaming purposes compared to mainstream consumer-grade processors.
AMD 4th Gen EPYC "Genoa" To Enjoy Slightly Better Performance With Linux 6.3
www.phoronix.com
AMD's upcoming 4th Gen EPYC "Genoa" processors are expected to benefit from Automatic IBRS, a new feature in the Linux 6.3 kernel. This feature provides better performance than the current Retpolines implementation for mitigating Spectre V2. The Automatic IBRS support is new to Zen 4 processors and will be enabled by default in Linux 6.3. Benchmarks on the AMD EPYC 9654 server processors show the performance improvement with Automatic IBRS. This feature is similar to Intel's Enhanced IBRS and will be available on both client and server CPUs. The patches for enabling Automatic IBRS have been in the works since November and are now being finalized for the upcoming kernel release.
4th Gen Intel Xeon W9-3495X – It’s a monster - KitGuru
www.kitguru.net
The 4th Gen Intel Xeon W9-3495X is a powerful CPU that performs well in gaming, as shown in Borderlands 3 and Far Cry 6 at 1440p. It competes with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and delivers good performance with its high clock speeds and 3D cache in Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Intel Xeon w9 3495X and w9 3475X Review
The Intel Xeon w9 3495X and w9 3475X are powerful processors that excel in 3D rendering but fall short in video encoding and gaming. They offer impressive performance in Cinebench and Blender, rendering scenes quickly. However, video encoding benchmarks did not utilize the high core count effectively. Gaming performance was also lacking, as games are designed for consoles with fewer cores. These processors are best suited for 3D rendering and specific video encoders that can take advantage of the thread count. Overclocking the Xeon w9-3475X showed that some benchmarks prioritize clock speed over threads. Overall, these processors offer unmatched speed for those with the right requirements and budget.
Intel Xeon w9 3495X and w9 3475X Review
The Intel Xeon w9-3475X and w9-3495X are high-end processors aimed at demanding users in fields like CAD and rendering. With 72 and 112 threads respectively, these CPUs offer extreme performance for intensive tasks. They have a base frequency of 2.2 GHz and 1.9 GHz, and a maximum turbo power of 360W and 420W. The Intel Xeon w9-3495X is priced at $5889, while the w9-3475X is priced at $3739. These processors are not recommended for gaming or casual use, but rather for professionals who require top-tier performance.
Review: Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE and Intel W9-3495X
The Intel Xeon W9-3495X processor is the top-of-the-range model in the Xeon W-3400 series, with 56 cores and 112 threads. It has a base frequency of 1.9 GHz and can boost up to 4.8 GHz. The CPU-Z tool confirms that the processor is recognized correctly. During testing, all 56 cores were active and performed well, completing the R23 benchmark quickly. The temperatures were excellent, and the Noctua cooler kept the cores at 2.88 GHz.
4th Gen Intel Xeon W9-3495X – It’s a monster
The 4th Gen Intel Xeon W9-3495X is a powerful workstation CPU with 56 cores. It performs well in Cinebench and Blender tests, but its power draw is high and clock speeds are limited. The CPU temperatures are impressively low. The price is competitive with AMD, but Intel needs to improve its 5th Gen technology.
+ 4
AI COMPARISON
Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9654 | Intel Xeon W9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Threads | 192 | 112 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | N/A |
| Total Clock Speed | 230.4 GHz | 106.4 GHz |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 8 |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB | 105 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| Semiconductor Size | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| CPU TDP | 360W | 350W |
| 64-bit | Yes | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | No | No |
| Turbo Speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 6144 KB | 4480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB | 112 MB |
| Max Memory Size | N/A | 4000 GB |
| Multi-threading | Yes | Yes |
| Instruction Sets | SSE, AVX, AES, FMA, MMX | MMX, SSE, AVX, AES, FMA |
Summary
The AMD Epyc 9654 and Intel Xeon W9-3495X are both high-performance processors designed for enterprise and data-intensive applications, though they cater to slightly different needs due to their core and thread counts, memory support, and other key features.
AMD Epyc 9654 excels in environments requiring high thread counts and memory bandwidth, making it ideal for multi-threaded applications and server environments. It supports a massive 192 threads and 12 memory channels, providing superior multitasking and memory handling capabilities. Additionally, its lower semiconductor size at 5 nm potentially offers better energy efficiency and performance than the Intel model.
Intel Xeon W9-3495X, with 112 threads and a higher turbo speed of 4.8 GHz, is tailored more towards tasks that can benefit from higher clock speeds, such as some types of scientific simulations or high-frequency trading applications. The Xeon also supports a huge amount of memory up to 4000 GB, catering well to memory-intensive applications like large databases or in-memory analytics.
Recommendations
For data centers and enterprise servers: AMD Epyc 9654 is recommended due to its higher thread count and memory bandwidth, which are crucial for handling large volumes of data and simultaneous processes.
For high-performance computing applications requiring high clock speeds: Intel Xeon W9-3495X is preferable, especially if the tasks benefit more from clock speed than thread count.
For graphics rendering and video editing: Both processors are well-suited, though the AMD Epyc may have a slight edge in highly threaded tasks such as 3D rendering and complex simulations.
For gaming: Neither processor is ideal as they are both designed for server and workstation use, where high core and thread counts are prioritized over the single-thread performance critical in gaming scenarios.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
