AMD Epyc 9654 vs Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
SOURCE ARTICLES
Comprehensive Guide to AMD’s EPYC 9654: The 96-Core Processor — Specs, Reviews, Workstations, and More
medium.com
Summary
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a powerful 96-core processor designed for high-performance computing tasks. It offers unparalleled multitasking capabilities with 192 threads and is compatible with enterprise-grade servers. The processor is engineered for optimal performance in heavy-duty computing tasks and has advanced power management features for energy efficiency. Cooling is crucial for this processor, and liquid cooling and advanced air-cooling solutions are recommended. The price of the EPYC 9654 varies depending on the retailer. It is ideal for professionals in fields like 3D rendering, video editing, and data analytics, as well as enterprises that require robust servers. The processor has received glowing reviews for its ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously and enhance professional productivity. While it can run games efficiently, it is considered an overinvestment for gaming purposes compared to mainstream consumer-grade processors.
AMD 4th Gen EPYC "Genoa" To Enjoy Slightly Better Performance With Linux 6.3
www.phoronix.com
AMD's upcoming 4th Gen EPYC "Genoa" processors are expected to benefit from Automatic IBRS, a new feature in the Linux 6.3 kernel. This feature provides better performance than the current Retpolines implementation for mitigating Spectre V2. The Automatic IBRS support is new to Zen 4 processors and will be enabled by default in Linux 6.3. Benchmarks on the AMD EPYC 9654 server processors show the performance improvement with Automatic IBRS. This feature is similar to Intel's Enhanced IBRS and will be available on both client and server CPUs. The patches for enabling Automatic IBRS have been in the works since November and are now being finalized for the upcoming kernel release.
Xeon E7-8890 v4 vs Core i7-7700K [1-Benchmark Showdown]
technical.city
The Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i7-7700K are processors with different market types, architectures, and prices. The i7-7700K has better value for money and higher performance in benchmark tests. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 24 cores and 48 threads. The i7-7700K has a higher base and boost clock speed. It also has support for technologies like Intel AVX2 and Turbo Boost, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has support for AES-NI and AVX. The i7-7700K is compatible with FCLGA1151 socket, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 is compatible with FCLGA2011 socket. The i7-7700K has integrated Intel HD Graphics 630, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 does not have integrated graphics. The i7-7700K outperforms the Xeon E7-8890 v4 in benchmark tests by 371%. The i7-7700K is a desktop processor, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 is a server/workstation processor.
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6154: What is the difference?
The Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Intel Xeon Gold 6154 have differences in their thermal design power (TDP), performance, and features. The Xeon Gold 6154 has a lower TDP, indicating lower power consumption. It also has a higher number of transistors, offering more computational power. The Xeon Gold 6154 supports newer versions of PCIe, DirectX, and OpenCL, providing better performance and graphics capabilities. The Xeon Gold 6154 is a newer and more powerful processor compared to the Xeon E7-8890 v4.
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 @ 2.20GHz
The [Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 @ 2.20GHz offers high performance and value for money. It outperforms 10 other common CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. The CPUMark per dollar is also favorable. The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor.
Xeon E7-8890 v4 [in 1 benchmark]
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 is a Broadwell architecture desktop processor with 24 cores and 48 threads. It has a maximum frequency of 3400 MHz and supports DDR4 and DDR3 memory. The processor is compatible with FCLGA2011 socket and has a TDP of 165 Watts. It provides poor benchmark performance compared to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. The Xeon E7-8890 v4 was released in June 2016 with a recommended price of $7,174.
+ 3
AI COMPARISON
Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9654 | Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores/Threads | 96 cores / 192 threads | 24 cores / 48 threads |
| Total Clock Speed | 230.4 GHz | 52.8 GHz |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 102 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 3 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 4 |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB | 60 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | N/A |
| Semiconductor Size | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| CPU TDP | 360W | 165W |
| Turbo Speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| RAM Speed Maximum | 4800 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | No | No |
| Instruction Sets | Advanced (includes AVX, AES, FMA) | Basic (includes AVX, AES, MMX) |
| Recommended Use | High-performance tasks, data analytics, 3D rendering | Server/workstation applications |
| Price Range | High | Very high ($7,174) |
Summary
Performance and Architecture: The AMD Epyc 9654 offers significantly higher core and thread counts, better memory bandwidth, and faster RAM speeds compared to the Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4. It operates on a more advanced 5 nm semiconductor process, suggesting greater efficiency and power handling, while the Xeon operates on a 14 nm process.
Capabilities: AMD's Epyc 9654 with PCIe version 5 offers newer technology and higher data transfer capabilities than Intel's version 3. Both processors support multithreading and lack integrated graphics, prioritizing raw processing power over GPU-related tasks.
Use Cases: The AMD Epyc 9654 is tailored for intensive computing tasks such as 3D rendering, video editing, and data analytics, often recommended for use in high-end workstations and servers. The Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4, although powerful, is more suitable for traditional server and workstation roles, emphasizing reliability and enterprise applications.
Cost Efficiency: AMD's processor, while likely expensive, does not have a listed price akin to the Intel's high mark, making Intel's option potentially less cost-effective for newer installations, considering its performance metrics and age.
Recommendations
For Enterprise Servers and Data-Intensive Applications: The AMD Epyc 9654 is recommended due to its superior multitasking capabilities, higher memory bandwidth, and newer technology support.
For Budget-Conscious Enterprises: The Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 remains a viable option for existing infrastructures where replacing entire systems for compatibility with newer CPUs like the AMD Epyc 9654 isn't feasible.
For High-End Workstations: Users requiring extreme multitasking capabilities and handling massive data sets, especially in creative and analytical fields, would benefit most from the AMD Epyc 9654.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
