AMD Epyc 9634 vs AMD Epyc 9754
SOURCE ARTICLES
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9634
www.cpubenchmark.net
The [Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9634 offers high performance compared to other common CPUs and provides good value for money. The PassMark CPU Mark graph shows its relative performance, while the CPUMark per dollar graph indicates its value. The pricing history data displays the price for a single processor.
AMD Epyc 9634 vs AMD Epyc 9684X: What is the difference?
versus.com
The AMD Epyc 9634 and AMD Epyc 9684X processors have different thermal design power (TDP) and number of transistors. The Epyc 9634 has an unknown CPU temperature and DirectX version, while the Epyc 9684X has unknown values for CPU temperature and number of transistors. The Epyc 9684X supports a higher PCIe version and is likely a newer, more powerful processor.
AMD EPYC 7532 vs 9634
www.cpu-world.com
The AMD EPYC 7532 has advantages in terms of number of cores/threads, operating frequency, and on-chip cache. The AMD EPYC 9634 has advantages in terms of thermal design power. Both processors have similar characteristics but with slight differences in performance.
Supermicro CloudDC Review Single-Socket AMD EPYC AS-2015CS-TNR
The Supermicro CloudDC AS-2015CS-TNR is a well-rounded single-socket server with low power consumption. It comes with two 1.2kW 80Plus Titanium power supplies, ensuring high efficiency. The power consumption of the server is surprisingly low, even with 84 cores, peaking at under 500W. The server is designed to provide efficient use of rack power budgets, operating in the 60-250W range. It offers a more cloud-like approach with standardized connectors and easy serviceability. The AMD EPYC 9634 processor delivers impressive performance with low power consumption, making it a great choice for those looking to upgrade from Intel Xeon E5 V4 servers. Overall, the Supermicro CloudDC AS-2015CS-TNR is a reliable and efficient server solution.
EPYC 9634
AMD EPYC 9634 is a Genoa architecture desktop processor with 84 cores and 168 threads. It has a maximum frequency of 3700 MHz and supports DDR5-4800 memory. The processor is compatible with AMD Socket SP5 and has a TDP of 290 Watt. It supports PCIe version 5.0 with 128 PCIe Express lanes. The benchmark results for EPYC 9634 are not available.
AMD Bergamo & Genoa-X EPYC Server CPUs Crush The Competition With Sheer Performance & Efficiency Dominance
AMD's EPYC Bergamo and Genoa-X CPUs have been praised for their exceptional performance and efficiency. The Genoa-X chips offer up to 96 cores and 1.1 GB of L3 cache, while Bergamo boasts up to 128 Zen 4C cores. Both CPUs outperform Intel's Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPU and offer significant power efficiency improvements. AMD's dominance in the server market is expected to continue with the upcoming Sierra Forrest and Siena lineup.
Running The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs With A 320W cTDP To Enhance Power Efficiency Review
The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs can be run with a 320W cTDP to enhance power efficiency. Lowering the TDP to 320W delivers similar performance across workloads while reducing CPU power consumption. The EPYC 9754 2P at 320W runs at around 99% the performance of the default 360W configuration, with up to 5% lower power consumption. This option is beneficial for maximizing power efficiency in server environments. Additionally, switching to a 400W TDP increases performance by about 6% with a 10% power increase. AMD's cTDP options allow for fine-tuning servers for maximum performance or squeezing out the most possible performance.
AMD Bergamo And Genoa-X Performance Review: EPYC Chips For Big Iron Workloads - Page 2
The review compares the performance of AMD's Bergamo and Genoa-X EPYC chips for big iron workloads. The tests were conducted using Ubuntu Server 22.04 with the 5.15.0-76-generic Linux kernel. The AMD EPYC 9754 performed well in Coremark, 7-Zip decompression, and Blender 3D rendering. The EPYC 9684X excelled in 7-Zip compression and Linux kernel compilation. In terms of video encoding, the EPYC 9654 performed best in 4K x264 encoding, while the EPYC 9754 lagged behind. For database processing, the Bergamo and Genoa-X chips outperformed Intel's offerings in both read-only and read-write workloads. However, in web server benchmarks, Intel's chips performed better, particularly in NGINX. Intel's accelerators also provided an advantage in hashing algorithms.
+ 5
AI COMPARISON
Product Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9634 | AMD Epyc 9754 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 168 threads | 256 threads |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s |
| Total Clock Speed | 189 GHz | 288 GHz |
| PCIe | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 12 |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB | 256 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| L1 Cache | 5376 KB | 8192 KB |
| CPU TDP | 290W | 360W |
| 64-bit | Yes | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | No | No |
| DirectX Version | None | None |
| Turbo | 3.7GHz | 3.1GHz |
| L2 Cache | 84 MB | 128 MB |
| RAM Speed Max | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
| Semiconductor Size | 5 nm | Not Specified |
| Max Memory Size | Not Specified | 6000GB |
| Instruction Sets | sse_4_2, sse_4_1, avx, aes, fma_3, etc. | mmx, sse_4_1, sse_4_2, avx, avx_2, etc. |
Summary
- Performance: AMD Epyc 9634 and AMD Epyc 9754 CPUs both exhibit high performance levels, with the Epyc 9754 leading in sheer core count and maximum clock speed, which translates to enhanced computational power for more intensive tasks.
- Power Consumption: Epyc 9634, with a TDP of 290W, is more power-efficient compared to the Epyc 9754's 360W, making it a better choice for energy-conscious setups. The 9754, however, offers configurable TDP for further efficiency.
- Cache and Memory: Epyc 9634 has a larger L3 cache, which can benefit data-intensive applications, whereas Epyc 9754 has more L2 cache and supports a much larger maximum memory size, making it ideal for memory-heavy applications.
- Technology: Both CPUs are built on advanced semiconductor technology with support for DDR5, PCIe 5.0, and multithreading, making them suitable for the latest high-performance computing environments.
Recommendations
- Data Centers and High-Performance Tasks: The AMD Epyc 9754, with its higher thread count and superior clock speed, is recommended for environments where maximum computational power and memory are crucial, such as large-scale virtualization and heavy computational tasks.
- Energy Efficiency and Cost-Effective Performance: The AMD Epyc 9634 is better suited for users seeking a balance between performance and energy efficiency, especially useful in dual CPU setups and for tasks that require high throughput but are sensitive to power and heat generation.
- Graphics and Media Processing: Given the lack of integrated graphics in both models, a separate GPU will be necessary for tasks requiring graphical processing. For server setups focused on rendering or video processing, the higher thread count of the Epyc 9754 would be beneficial.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
