AMD Epyc 9554 vs AMD Epyc 9754
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD EPYC 9554 Benchmark, Test and specs
www.cpu-monkey.com
The AMD EPYC 9554 is a powerful processor with 64 cores and 128 threads. It has a base frequency of 3.10 GHz and a turbo frequency of 3.75 GHz. The processor uses the SP5 socket and is based on the 4th generation of the AMD EPYC series. It has a TDP of 360 W and supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9554 scored 1,568 points in the Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark and 65,664 points in the multi-core benchmark. It is a desktop/server processor and does not have an integrated GPU. The processor was released in Q4/2022 and has a release price of $9087.
AMD EPYC 9554 & EPYC 9654 Benchmarks - Outstanding Performance For Linux HPC/Servers Review
www.phoronix.com
The AMD EPYC Genoa processors, with up to 96 cores, showed outstanding performance in CPU-based render farms. They rendered the BMW scene in just 8 seconds, outperforming Xeon Scalable Ice Lake processors. The power determinism mode further improved Blender render times, although it increased power/thermal impact. Genoa CPUs were comparable in price to Milan CPUs and offered better performance-per-Watt than other Intel/AMD CPUs. Intel's Embree ray-tracing kernels benefited significantly from Genoa with AVX-512, with the EPYC 9654 2P processor being twice as fast as the AMD EPYC 7773X 2P processor.
AMD Bergamo & Genoa-X EPYC Server CPUs Crush The Competition With Sheer Performance & Efficiency Dominance
wccftech.com
AMD's EPYC Bergamo and Genoa-X CPUs have been praised for their exceptional performance and efficiency. The Genoa-X chips offer up to 96 cores and 1.1 GB of L3 cache, while Bergamo boasts up to 128 Zen 4C cores. Both CPUs outperform Intel's Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPU and offer significant power efficiency improvements. AMD's dominance in the server market is expected to continue with the upcoming Sierra Forrest and Siena lineup.
Running The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs With A 320W cTDP To Enhance Power Efficiency Review
The AMD EPYC 9754 CPUs can be run with a 320W cTDP to enhance power efficiency. Lowering the TDP to 320W delivers similar performance across workloads while reducing CPU power consumption. The EPYC 9754 2P at 320W runs at around 99% the performance of the default 360W configuration, with up to 5% lower power consumption. This option is beneficial for maximizing power efficiency in server environments. Additionally, switching to a 400W TDP increases performance by about 6% with a 10% power increase. AMD's cTDP options allow for fine-tuning servers for maximum performance or squeezing out the most possible performance.
AMD Bergamo And Genoa-X Performance Review: EPYC Chips For Big Iron Workloads - Page 2
The review compares the performance of AMD's Bergamo and Genoa-X EPYC chips for big iron workloads. The tests were conducted using Ubuntu Server 22.04 with the 5.15.0-76-generic Linux kernel. The AMD EPYC 9754 performed well in Coremark, 7-Zip decompression, and Blender 3D rendering. The EPYC 9684X excelled in 7-Zip compression and Linux kernel compilation. In terms of video encoding, the EPYC 9654 performed best in 4K x264 encoding, while the EPYC 9754 lagged behind. For database processing, the Bergamo and Genoa-X chips outperformed Intel's offerings in both read-only and read-write workloads. However, in web server benchmarks, Intel's chips performed better, particularly in NGINX. Intel's accelerators also provided an advantage in hashing algorithms.
+ 2
AI COMPARISON
Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9554 | AMD Epyc 9754 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 128 threads | 256 threads |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s |
| Total Clock Speed | 198.4 GHz | 288 GHz |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 12 |
| Turbo Clock Speed | 3.75 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| L1 Cache | 4096 KB | 8192 KB |
| CPU TDP | 360 W | 360 W (option to reduce to 320 W) |
| Semiconductor Size | 5 nm | Not specified |
| Integrated Graphics | No | No |
| Max Memory Size | 6144 GB | 6000 GB |
| RAM Speed Max | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
| Instruction Sets | sse_4_2, sse_4_1, avx, aes, fma_3, etc. | mmx, sse_4_1, sse_4_2, avx, avx_2, etc. |
| 64-bit Support | Yes | Yes |
| ECC Memory Support | Yes | Yes |
Summary
Both AMD Epyc 9554 and AMD Epyc 9754 processors offer impressive specs geared towards high-performance server environments, though the 9754 edges out with double the thread count and potentially higher overall clock speeds. They share many similarities, including memory bandwidth, PCIe version, DDR version, maximum RAM speed, and no integrated graphics.
AMD Epyc 9554 excels in environments demanding high turbo clock speeds (up to 3.75 GHz) and robust multithreading, making it ideal for high-load scenarios like CPU-based render farms and large-scale virtualizations. It's noted for reducing render times significantly in benchmarks compared to competitors like Intel's Ice Lake processors.
AMD Epyc 9754 boasts up to 256 threads and focuses on maximizing power efficiency, which can be crucial for data centers looking to optimize operational costs. The option to adjust TDP down to 320 W without a substantial performance drop is a standout feature. Its performance in compute-heavy tasks and efficiency in power consumption make it suitable for high-demand data centers and complex calculations.
Recommendations
-
For High-Performance Computing and Render Farms: The AMD Epyc 9554 is preferable due to its higher turbo speeds and outstanding performance in graphical and CPU-intensive tasks.
-
For Energy-Efficient Data Centers and Longevity: The AMD Epyc 9754, with its customizable TDP settings and impressive multithreading capabilities, would be more suitable, particularly where power consumption is a critical factor.
-
For Memory-Intensive Applications: Both processors support significant amounts of RAM with high-speed capabilities, but the Epyc 9754 offers slightly lower maximum memory, which might be a consideration depending on the specific needs.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
