AMD Epyc 9474F vs AMD Epyc 9654P
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD EPYC 9474F Benchmark, Test and specs
www.cpu-monkey.com
The AMD EPYC 9474F is a powerful processor with 48 cores and 96 threads. It has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz and a turbo frequency of 4.10 GHz. The processor supports a maximum of 6144 GB memory and has a TDP of 360 W. It uses the Genoa / Genoa-X architecture and is compatible with the SP5 socket. The AMD EPYC 9474F is suitable for both desktop and server use.
EPYC 9474F [in 1 benchmark]
technical.city
AMD EPYC 9474F is a high-end desktop processor with 48 cores and 96 threads. It has a maximum frequency of 4100 MHz and supports DDR5-4800 memory. The processor provides good benchmark performance at 68.13% of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. It is compatible with AMD Socket SP5 and has a TDP of 360 Watt. The EPYC 9474F is based on the Genoa architecture and was released on November 10, 2022, with a launch price of $6,780.
AMD Epyc 9474F vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8468: What is the difference?
versus.com
The AMD Epyc 9474F and Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 CPUs have differences in thermal design power (TDP), performance, power consumption, and graphics capabilities. The Epyc 9474F has an unknown DirectX version and transistor count, while the Xeon Platinum 8468 has an unknown DirectX version and higher transistor count. The TDP of the Epyc 9474F is lower, indicating lower power consumption. The Xeon Platinum 8468 has a higher number of transistors, suggesting better performance.
AMD EPYC 9474F
The AMD EPYC 9474F CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It also has a high single-thread performance. However, there is not enough data to create a distribution graph for its CPU mark.
Streamlined 48-core AMD EPYC 9474F outscores 64-core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX in PassMark's CPU Mark test suite
The 48-core AMD EPYC 9474F outperforms the 64-core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX in PassMark's CPU Mark test suite. Despite having fewer cores, the EPYC 9474F achieves a higher score due to the streamlining effects of the Zen 4 architecture and 5 nm fabrication process. The EPYC 9474F has a higher performance efficiency, producing 2,064 per core compared to the Threadripper PRO's 1,510 per core. The EPYC 9474F has a higher TDP of 360 W compared to the Threadripper PRO's 280 W.
AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" AVX-512 Performance Analysis
The AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" processor delivers impressive AVX-512 performance without negative impacts on power consumption or clock frequencies. The AVX-512 implementation in Zen 4 is robust and efficient, outperforming early generations of AVX-512 on Intel processors. The EPYC 9654 2P performance with and without AVX-512 usage was tested, showing the impact on raw performance, performance-per-Watt, CPU power consumption, core temperature, and peak frequency. The testing was done on Ubuntu 22.10 with GCC 12.2 and the Linux 6.1 kernel.
AMD EPYC 9654 shows what 96 Zen 4 cores can do by outbenching a Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30% on PassMark
The AMD EPYC 9654 processor has outperformed its competitors on PassMark, surpassing the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30%. With its 96 Zen 4 cores, the EPYC 9654 achieved a CPU Mark of 124,119 points, setting a new benchmark. Although it has a slower single-thread score, the EPYC 9654 showcases AMD's excellence with its 5-nanometer manufacturing technology and support for AVX-512, PCIe 5.0, and DDR5. The EPYC 9654's reign may be short-lived as the upcoming 128-core EPYC 9754 chips are expected to showcase even greater capabilities.
AMD EPYC 9654P
The AMD EPYC 9654P CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It also has a decent single-thread performance. However, there is not enough data available to create a distribution graph for its CPU mark.
+ 5
AI COMPARISON
Product Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9474F | AMD Epyc 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 48 | 96 |
| Threads | 96 | 192 |
| Base Clock Speed | 3.60 GHz | Not specified |
| Turbo Clock Speed | 4.10 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Total Clock Speed | 172.8 GHz | 230.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 384 MB |
| TDP | 360W | 360W |
| Semiconductor Size | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 12 |
| Max Memory Size | 6144 GB | 6000 GB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| Price | $6,780 | Not specified |
Comparative Analysis
The AMD Epyc 9474F and 9654P are both high-performance server CPUs from AMD's EPYC series, featuring cutting-edge technology ideal for demanding server environments. The Epyc 9474F is built on a 5 nm process with 48 cores and supports up to 96 threads, while the Epyc 9654P uses a slightly larger 6 nm process but doubles the cores to 96 and supports 192 threads. Both CPUs have the same thermal design power (TDP) of 360W and offer extensive PCIe Gen 5 support, ensuring ample bandwidth for high-speed components.
The Epyc 9474F has a higher turbo clock speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the 3.7 GHz of the Epyc 9654P, which may offer advantages in single-threaded tasks. However, the 9654P, with its higher core and thread count, is likely to excel in multi-threaded environments, offering substantial improvements in raw computational power and efficiency.
Both processors support 12 memory channels and DDR5-4800, but the Epyc 9654P slightly edges out with a maximum memory support of 6000 GB against the 6144 GB of the 9474F. Despite the small difference, this factor could be critical in highly memory-intensive applications.
Recommendations for Potential Buyers
- High-Performance Servers: For buyers looking to maximize multi-threaded performance for applications like virtualization, large databases, and intensive data processing, the AMD Epyc 9654P with its higher core and thread count is the superior choice.
- Cost-Effective Performance: If budget is a concern and the tasks involve a mix of single-threaded and multi-threaded applications, the AMD Epyc 9474F offers a balanced performance at a significant price point.
- Energy Efficiency and Cooling Requirements: Both CPUs have the same TDP, but the choice might depend on the specific cooling solutions available and the energy cost in your region, given the high power consumption.
These recommendations are tailored to different user needs, ensuring that you can choose the most suitable processor based on your specific performance requirements and budget constraints.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
