AMD Epyc 9454 vs AMD Epyc 9654P
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD EPYC 9454P
www.cpubenchmark.net
The AMD EPYC 9454P CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It also shows good performance in single-threaded operations. However, there is not enough data available to create a distribution graph for the CPU mark.
EPYC 9454P [in 1 benchmark]
technical.city
AMD EPYC 9454P is a high-end desktop processor with 48 cores and 96 threads. It has a maximum frequency of 3800 MHz and supports DDR5-4800 memory. The processor provides good benchmark performance at 62.28% of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. It is compatible with AMD Socket SP5 and has a TDP of 290 Watt. The EPYC 9454P is based on the Genoa architecture and was released on November 10, 2022, with a launch price of $4,598.
AMD EPYC 9554 & EPYC 9654 Benchmarks - Outstanding Performance For Linux HPC/Servers Review
www.phoronix.com
The AMD EPYC 9554 and EPYC 9654 processors offer outstanding performance for Linux HPC/servers. The EPYC 9654 is the flagship processor with 96 cores and a 2.4GHz base clock, while the EPYC 9554 has 64 cores and a 3.1GHz base clock. Both processors have a 360 Watt TDP and can be adjusted from 320 to 400 Watts. The EPYC 9374F, a 32-core high frequency part, will be featured in a separate review. The EPYC 9654 is priced at around $11,805, the EPYC 9554 at around $9,087, and the EPYC 9374F at around $4,850.
AMD Epyc 9454 vs AMD Epyc 9534: What is the difference?
The AMD Epyc 9454 and AMD Epyc 9534 are processors with different thermal design power (TDP) and performance capabilities. The Epyc 9454 has an unknown CPU temperature and DirectX version, while the Epyc 9534 has unknown values for TDP, CPU temperature, and DirectX version. The number of transistors is also unknown for both processors. A lower TDP indicates lower power consumption, while a higher transistor count suggests a more powerful processor.
AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" AVX-512 Performance Analysis
The AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" processor delivers impressive AVX-512 performance without negative impacts on power consumption or clock frequencies. The AVX-512 implementation in Zen 4 is robust and efficient, outperforming early generations of AVX-512 on Intel processors. The EPYC 9654 2P performance with and without AVX-512 usage was tested, showing the impact on raw performance, performance-per-Watt, CPU power consumption, core temperature, and peak frequency. The testing was done on Ubuntu 22.10 with GCC 12.2 and the Linux 6.1 kernel.
AMD EPYC 9654 shows what 96 Zen 4 cores can do by outbenching a Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30% on PassMark
The AMD EPYC 9654 processor has outperformed its competitors on PassMark, surpassing the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30%. With its 96 Zen 4 cores, the EPYC 9654 achieved a CPU Mark of 124,119 points, setting a new benchmark. Although it has a slower single-thread score, the EPYC 9654 showcases AMD's excellence with its 5-nanometer manufacturing technology and support for AVX-512, PCIe 5.0, and DDR5. The EPYC 9654's reign may be short-lived as the upcoming 128-core EPYC 9754 chips are expected to showcase even greater capabilities.
AMD EPYC 9654P
The AMD EPYC 9654P CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It also has a decent single-thread performance. However, there is not enough data available to create a distribution graph for its CPU mark.
+ 4
AI COMPARISON
Product Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9454 | AMD Epyc 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 96 threads | 192 threads |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s |
| Total Clock Speed | 132 GHz | 230.4 GHz |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 12 |
| Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8GHz | 3.7GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 384 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| Semiconductor Size | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU TDP | 290W | 360W |
| 64-bit Support | Yes | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | No | No |
| DirectX Version | None | None |
| L1 Cache | 3072 KB | 6144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB |
| RAM Speed Max | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
| Max Memory Size | - | 6000GB |
| Price Approx | $4,598 | $11,805 |
Summary of Differences and Similarities
- Core Count and Threads: The AMD Epyc 9654P has double the core count and threads compared to the Epyc 9454, suggesting significantly higher parallel processing capabilities.
- Clock Speed and TDP: The Epyc 9654P has a slightly lower turbo clock speed and a higher TDP, indicating a trade-off between power consumption and performance capabilities.
- Cache Size: The 9654P has more L3 cache, which can improve performance in data-intensive applications.
- Price: There is a substantial price difference, with the Epyc 9654P being more than twice as expensive as the 9454.
- Performance Metrics: Benchmarks indicate that both CPUs perform exceptionally well, but the Epyc 9654P generally has higher performance metrics across various tests due to its increased core and thread count.
Recommendations for Potential Buyers
- High-Performance Computing and Servers: For buyers requiring the utmost in performance for tasks like virtualization, large-scale computations, and serving high-traffic data, the AMD Epyc 9654P with its higher core and thread count, as well as substantial memory handling capabilities, is recommended despite its higher cost.
- Cost-Effective Professional Systems: For users who need a powerful CPU but are also mindful of budget constraints, the AMD Epyc 9454 offers a balanced performance at a significantly lower price point. It's suitable for less intensive server environments and professional workstations that can benefit from fast processing but do not justify the premium price of the 9654P.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
