AMD Epyc 9354 vs AMD Epyc 9654P
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD Epyc 9354 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6430: What is the difference?
versus.com
The AMD Epyc 9354 and Intel Xeon Gold 6430 have differences in thermal design power (TDP), semiconductor size, chipset transistor count, PCIe support, operating system compatibility, integrated graphics, DirectX version, and transistor count. The Epyc 9354 has a lower TDP, smaller semiconductors, and higher PCIe bandwidth. The Xeon Gold 6430 has unknown values for DirectX version and transistor count.
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9354
www.cpubenchmark.net
The [Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9354 offers high performance and value for money. It outperforms 10 other common CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. The CPUMark per dollar is also favorable. The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor.
AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" AVX-512 Performance Analysis
www.phoronix.com
The AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" processor delivers impressive AVX-512 performance without negative impacts on power consumption or clock frequencies. The AVX-512 implementation in Zen 4 is robust and efficient, outperforming early generations of AVX-512 on Intel processors. The EPYC 9654 2P performance with and without AVX-512 usage was tested, showing the impact on raw performance, performance-per-Watt, CPU power consumption, core temperature, and peak frequency. The testing was done on Ubuntu 22.10 with GCC 12.2 and the Linux 6.1 kernel.
AMD EPYC 9654 shows what 96 Zen 4 cores can do by outbenching a Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30% on PassMark
The AMD EPYC 9654 processor has outperformed its competitors on PassMark, surpassing the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30%. With its 96 Zen 4 cores, the EPYC 9654 achieved a CPU Mark of 124,119 points, setting a new benchmark. Although it has a slower single-thread score, the EPYC 9654 showcases AMD's excellence with its 5-nanometer manufacturing technology and support for AVX-512, PCIe 5.0, and DDR5. The EPYC 9654's reign may be short-lived as the upcoming 128-core EPYC 9754 chips are expected to showcase even greater capabilities.
AMD EPYC 9654P
The AMD EPYC 9654P CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It also has a decent single-thread performance. However, there is not enough data available to create a distribution graph for its CPU mark.
+ 2
AI COMPARISON
Product Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9354 | AMD Epyc 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 64 threads | 192 threads |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s |
| Total Clock Speed | 104 GHz | 230.4 GHz |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 12 |
| Turbo Speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 384 MB |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| Semiconductor Size | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU TDP | 280 W | 360 W |
| 64-bit Support | Yes | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | No | No |
| DirectX Version | None | None |
| L1 Cache | 2048 KB | 6144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 96 MB |
| L2 Cache per Core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core |
| L3 Cache per Core | 8 MB/core | 4 MB/core |
| Memory ECC | Yes | Yes |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Multithreading | Yes | Yes |
| Instruction Sets | Various including AVX | More extensive including AVX-512 |
| Max Memory Size | Not specified | 6000 GB |
Summary
Performance and Capabilities:
- The AMD Epyc 9654P vastly outperforms the Epyc 9354 in terms of core count, total clock speed, L3 cache size, and overall raw computational power.
- Both CPUs offer the same memory bandwidth and support for DDR5, but the Epyc 9654P has a higher maximum memory capacity (6000 GB).
- The Epyc 9654P also benefits from a more advanced instruction set, including AVX-512, which contributes to its superior performance in various benchmarks.
Power and Efficiency:
- The Epyc 9354 has a lower TDP (280W) compared to the Epyc 9654P (360W), which may make it more suitable for environments where power efficiency is more critical.
- The semiconductor technology is slightly different, with the Epyc 9354 using a smaller 5 nm process compared to the 6 nm of the Epyc 9654P.
Use Case Recommendations:
- The Epyc 9654P is ideal for high-performance computing environments that require significant computational power and can handle higher power consumption.
- The Epyc 9354 is better suited for scenarios where a balance between performance and power consumption is necessary, making it suitable for diverse server applications not requiring the extreme scale of the 9654P.
Recommendations
- Data Centers and Scientific Computing: The Epyc 9654P with its higher core count and memory capacity is recommended.
- Medium-Scale Virtualization and Databases: The Epyc 9354 offers substantial power and efficiency, making it ideal for less intensive but still demanding server environments.
- Cost-Efficient Deployment: For organizations concerned with initial investment and operating costs, the Epyc 9354 provides a strong performance-to-cost ratio.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
