AMD Epyc 9334 vs AMD Epyc 9654P
SOURCE ARTICLES
AMD EPYC 9334 vs AMD EPYC 7543 Benchmark, comparison and differences
www.cpu-monkey.com
The AMD EPYC 9334 and AMD EPYC 7543 are both 32-core, 64-thread processors. The EPYC 9334 has a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz, while the EPYC 7543 has a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels, while the EPYC 7543 supports up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The EPYC 9334 was released in Q4/2022, while the EPYC 7543 was released in Q1/2021. The EPYC 9334 has a TDP of 210 W, while the EPYC 7543 has a TDP of 225 W.
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9334
www.cpubenchmark.net
The [Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9334 offers high performance and value for money. It outperforms 10 other common CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. The CPUMark per dollar is also impressive. The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor.
EPYC 9334 [in 1 benchmark]
technical.city
AMD EPYC 9334 is a Genoa architecture desktop processor with 32 cores and 64 threads. It has a maximum frequency of 3900 MHz and supports DDR5-4800 memory. The processor is compatible with AMD Socket SP5 and has a TDP of 210 Watt. In terms of benchmark performance, it scores 42.40% compared to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. The EPYC 9334 has PCIe version 5.0 with 128 PCIe Express lanes.
AMD EPYC 9334
The AMD EPYC 9334 CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It achieves high speeds in data compression and random string sorting. However, there is not enough data to create a distribution graph for the CPU mark.
Epyc 9334 qs over 7950x for vfx and 3d
The Epyc 9334 QS processor is recommended over the 7950x for VFX and 3D workloads. It is important to confirm the stepping before purchasing to ensure stability. The Epyc processor offers impressive performance with 256 threads and improved RAM bandwidth. However, it may not be significantly faster than the 7950x due to lower clock speeds. The cost of the Epyc processor, especially with additional RAM, should be considered.
AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" AVX-512 Performance Analysis
The AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" processor delivers impressive AVX-512 performance without negative impacts on power consumption or clock frequencies. The AVX-512 implementation in Zen 4 is robust and efficient, outperforming early generations of AVX-512 on Intel processors. The EPYC 9654 2P performance with and without AVX-512 usage was tested, showing the impact on raw performance, performance-per-Watt, CPU power consumption, core temperature, and peak frequency. The testing was done on Ubuntu 22.10 with GCC 12.2 and the Linux 6.1 kernel.
AMD EPYC 9654 shows what 96 Zen 4 cores can do by outbenching a Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30% on PassMark
The AMD EPYC 9654 processor has outperformed its competitors on PassMark, surpassing the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by almost 30%. With its 96 Zen 4 cores, the EPYC 9654 achieved a CPU Mark of 124,119 points, setting a new benchmark. Although it has a slower single-thread score, the EPYC 9654 showcases AMD's excellence with its 5-nanometer manufacturing technology and support for AVX-512, PCIe 5.0, and DDR5. The EPYC 9654's reign may be short-lived as the upcoming 128-core EPYC 9754 chips are expected to showcase even greater capabilities.
AMD EPYC 9654P
The AMD EPYC 9654P CPU performs well in various tests, including integer and floating-point math, finding prime numbers, sorting random strings, data encryption and compression, physics simulations, and extended instructions. It also has a decent single-thread performance. However, there is not enough data available to create a distribution graph for its CPU mark.
+ 5
AI COMPARISON
Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD Epyc 9334 | AMD Epyc 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores/Threads | 32/64 | 96/192 |
| Max Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 384 MB |
| Memory Channels | 12 | 12 |
| DDR Version | 5 | 5 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | 5 | 5 |
| Semiconductor Size | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| TDP | 210W | 360W |
| Max Memory Support | 6144 GB | 6000 GB |
| RAM Speed Max | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Price (USD) | $2,990 | Pricing not specified |
| Release Year | Q4/2022 | Recent (post Q1/2021) |
| Manufacturing Technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
Summary of Differences and Similarities
-
Performance and Cores: The AMD Epyc 9654P has significantly more cores and threads (96/192) compared to the AMD Epyc 9334 (32/64), suggesting better performance in multi-threaded applications. Despite the higher core count, the 9654P has a slightly lower max clock speed (3.7 GHz) than the 9334's 3.9 GHz.
-
Cache and Memory: Both CPUs have 12 memory channels and support DDR5-4800, but the 9654P offers a much larger L3 cache (384 MB vs. 128 MB), which may improve performance in cache-dependent tasks.
-
Power and Efficiency: The 9654P has a higher TDP of 360W compared to the 210W of the 9334, which might indicate higher power consumption but potentially better performance capabilities, especially under sustained workloads.
-
Technological Edge: Both processors use advanced technology, with the 9334 manufactured at a 5 nm process and the 9654P at a 6 nm process, indicating slight differences in power efficiency and transistor density.
-
Market Positioning and Pricing: The Epyc 9334 is priced at $2,990, while the pricing for the 9654P is not specified. The 9334 is positioned as a high-end server processor suitable for demanding tasks such as VFX and 3D applications but is older compared to the 9654P.
Recommendations for Potential Buyers
-
High-Performance Servers: For buyers needing the utmost in performance for tasks like virtualization, heavy computation, and high-traffic servers, the AMD Epyc 9654P with its higher core count and advanced capabilities would be more suitable.
-
Energy Efficiency and Cost: For those concerned with energy consumption and initial cost, the AMD Epyc 9334 offers a good balance of performance and power usage, especially in environments where absolute top-tier performance is not critical.
-
Graphics and VFX Workloads: The Epyc 9334, despite its lower core count, is still recommended for VFX and 3D applications due to its strong memory capabilities and ample cache, which are crucial for such tasks.
PRICES
ASK AI
BestVs.ai
Hello, I'm your AI shopping assistant. How can I help you?
AI can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
